User talk:ZDGilanyi13
ZDGilanyi13, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi ZDGilanyi13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, ZDGilanyi13. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Harry Gold (actor), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Harry Gold (actor) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks,
Killer Moff (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Harry Gold (Talent Agent) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject fails WP:GNG. Being a member of "the academy" isn't listed at WP:NACTOR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Harry Gold (Talent Agent) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Gold (Talent Agent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Gold (Talent Agent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Hello Chris,
Can you please explain to me why exactly this page is being nominated for deletion? I'm just trying to see how I can make this a better page for my boss. An exact example of what I can change would be great.
Thank you
- Be advised, I haven't been watching your talk page so I never saw this message. You should have contacted me on my talk page. In any event, since you have a conflict of interest (editing Wikipedia for your boss) then you're no longer allowed to edit the article. This isn't a negotiation. I nominated the article for deletion. It has to go through that process, which I cannot control. It looks like the community favors deletion, an administrator will likely delete the article, and the article will be prohibited from being re-created. Again, had you reached out to me earlier or perhaps read the numerous guidelines we have on editing we might have avoided this fate. Tell your boss that they should stay away from Wikipedia for PR purposes. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Harry Gold (Talent Agent), you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
TalentWorks moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, TalentWorks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 00:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:TalentWorks concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TalentWorks, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:TalentWorks
[edit]
Hello, ZDGilanyi13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TalentWorks".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)