User talk:Yyyikes

File copyright problem with File:Squirrel4.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Squirrel4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 05:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Color

In just what way is a link to a quiz, with no context at all, in keeping with our external links policy? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tkfy7cf (talk) 10:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above warning relates to your edit of the welfare-to-work article. Tkfy7cf (talk) 10:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Squirrel4.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Squirrel4.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/philipcohen/5152740959/. As a copyright violation, File:Squirrel4.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Squirrel4.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Squirrel4.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Squirrel4.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Squirrel4.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JovianEye (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Yyyikes, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 00:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harriet Presser.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AndrewN ^talk 05:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harriet Presser.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Drmies (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Harriet Presser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Drmies (talk) 00:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yyyikes. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LadyofShalott 16:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip N. Cohen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homogamy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Contexts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yyyikes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philip N Cohen2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Philip N Cohen2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. XXN, 20:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yyyikes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yyyikes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonalde Desai has been accepted

Sonalde Desai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to mention that while she is obviously notable per WP criteria and her research record and honorary title of Distinguishe Prof, the article needs more sources that are fully independent of the person....what others have written about her. That will improve the article. Thank you for creating this entry on an interesting Indian woman sociologist! Netherzone (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will look for additional secondary sources. Yyyikes (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Yyyikes. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Philip N. Cohen or SocArXiv or American Sociological Association or Contexts, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and policy for autobiographies for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Pabsoluterince (talk) 10:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, now you are attacking me because of the autofellatio disagreement? That's nasty. I disclosed my conflict of interest more than 10 years ago, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yyyikes. And no one has ever complained until now. Thank you for the reminder; I do my best to comply with all Wikipedia policies, including those on COI. Please consider your own motives in this situation. Yyyikes (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an attack, these are policies that you should be made aware of is all. I fairly regularly intervene with COI editing, it just so happens that I was made aware of yours through your reversion of my edit. Note that the page Philip N. Cohen, of which you are a major contributor, reads like a glowing promotional piece. In the future, simply suggest changes that you would like to make on the talk page of pages you have a COI. Currently there is a backlog of zero cases so it will add a small amount of delay on your side for the benefits of following the Wikipedia terms and conditions. I have zero authority over you, I can't block or ban or anything, but I am informing you of the policies because your editing appears to be non-compliant. Now that you are made aware you should abide by the best practises provided in the pages linked above. Pabsoluterince (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I try to keep the page current. It absolutely is not written like a glowing promotional piece, as I have been careful about that - it has zero complimentary adjectives and doesn't even list public awards and honors, positive reviews, promotions, etc., that other pages list - it is plainly descriptive, written like a bland academic personality page. Yyyikes (talk) 23:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not directly edit pages that you have a COI. The policy page Wikipedia:Autobiography provided above says the following "Editing a biography about yourself is acceptable only if you are removing unambiguous vandalism or clear-cut and serious violations of our biography of living persons policy." Pabsoluterince (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My motives are that I think that COI editing is better left undone (apart from some exceptions) for the integrity of the project and I want to begin a process of ensuring that best practises are followed in this case. Rest assured I can't enforce anything, so it will be up to the motive of others if you decide to ignore me. Sorry that I am the one to deliver this message. Pabsoluterince (talk) 23:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation

Hello Yyyikes. An editor has opened an investigation regarding your suspected abuse of multiple accounts. Editors are permitted to use multiple accounts in many circumstances, but not for certain deceptive practices such as avoiding scrutiny. You are invited to respond to the investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yyyikes; if you do not respond your accounts may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You all have way too much time on your hands (or a bias against me). None of this obsession with conflict of interest has revealed any material that was false or even biased. I have improved the site in the public interest. I have no response to your investigation. Do your worst. Yyyikes (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to conflict of interest, I agree with you. If nobody has been able to pinpoint any particular problem with your editing other than your identity five years after you disclosed it and with all the proper disclosures in place, I don't see any reason why Pabsoluterince decided to bother you about it. There was an issue with the article, you fixed it, that should have been the end of it. We discourage editors updating information about themselves; we don't forbid it.

But then six months after that incident you started using a second account, and have also used it to write about yourself without properly disclosing your identity. Why? It's very strange for someone who has edited as long as you have pretty much entirely without problems to suddenly start breaking rules for no apparent reason. I was hoping that you would explain what's going on, and we could work from there so you can go back to editing and I can go back to wasting time on real vandals. But if you really have no response or just refuse to work with me, then my options for resolving this are really quite limited.

I do hope to hear back from you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. I didn't know about a "sock puppet" rule but I guess it's reasonable (and all enforced by people whose identities are secret, because of course that's how Wikipedia rolls). I couldn't figure out how to make a COI request for someone else to update the photo on the page about me so I just made a new account to do it. Took 5 minutes. Then I guess I stayed in that account and edited other pages about sociologists, for no reason. Not sure that chronology is exactly right but that's the gist.

I don't care which account I use, it just bugs me to see sociology pages out of date so if I'm allowed to tinker with them that would be nice. Feel free to delete either account or whatever you do. Tx. Yyyikes (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, sorry I didn't get back to you on this. As long as you're familiar with the policy and aren't going to use the other account then I think we're fine here. If you do want to use the other account, have a look at WP:ALTACCN for advice on linking the two accounts. If you want to use a separate private account to avoid connections to your public persona, we have some advice on that under WP:PUBSOCK, but then you need to be careful to manage your private account's privacy, there's not a lot administrators can do to prevent other editors discovering the connection if you're not careful about it. And if you want to change your username, you can request a new one at Wikipedia:Changing username, but we also advise against editing under your real name (WP:REALNAME) because of the potential for harassment.

Sorry for the confusion and negativity here. Wikipedia does benefit from subject matter experts participating, but perceived conflicts of interest are a risk to Wikipedia's vision of neutrality, and some editors can't see past that. Basic uncontroversial updates to your own info (which can be verified to a reliable source) are welcome, but if you want to avoid the appearance of conflict, this is our "simple" guide to conflict-of-interest edit requests. If you have any other questions or run into any other problems you can post a question here with the {{Help me}} template, or ask a question at the tea house. Thanks again. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it, will read. Thanks! Yyyikes (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sociology of the family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vital statistics. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Michael Keaton

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Michael Keaton, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]