Hello, Yvernal! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bernstein2291 (talk) 07:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, well, they were not references: they did not contain anything that was referred to. They were external links. - Yvernal (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I know a reference when I see one, and this is as far as you can get from being one. This is a purely commercial site, with a lot of advertisements. In addition it is something like a database minus the data. The only "fact" that is there is also available in any of a number of other sites, all of them more trustworthy than this one. - Yvernal (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's listed as a source within the film project here. If you continue to remove reliable sources, I will request that you are blocked. Lugnuts (talk) 18:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do not follow your line of reasoning: that is marked "List of potential resources", not as a "List of required sources". Said entry in the database is empty of anything except advertisements and the Oscar nomination. The Oscar nomination is extremely well-established, with many sources. Pretending that this empty entry serves as a reference is as transparent as anything I have seen: it does not reference anything, whatsoever: it is purely a commercial advertisement. - Yvernal (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
