User talk:Yuvn86

1st revert

2nd revert

No one can miss the ARBPIA 1r sanction. It's on the article talk page. Nishidani (talk) 18:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to David Blatt, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Uri Geller. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Epeefleche (talk) 20:42, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theodor Herzl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hibbat Zion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts to Middle Eastern American

Hi Yuvn86, I noticed that you recently made 6 reverts to Middle Eastern American. If you feel that something is so important that you must repeatedly remove sourced material and revert it, could you post on the Talk page instead? Musashiaharon (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Musashiaharon. I described more than once my reasons for reverting. It was ignored. You added unrelated and unsourced information, I reverted it (explained why each time), and a sockpuppet using many different IPs kept reverting me back. You cannot add the total number of American Jews to that article when only a minority of them are registered as such (those who immigrated from West Asia and the Middle East). You and user Jeffgr9 (hopefully he's not your sockpuppet) added unsourced and wrong information that has nothing to with the article's subject and nothing to do with the American census. Yuvn86 (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rest assured, I have no sockpuppets. I merely wanted to suggest helping to form a consensus on the talk page and avoiding an edit war. This option is still open, as it always is, should you wish to pursue it. A full discussion is not always possible in edit comments.

If I am understanding your reference correctly, the information was sourced, but did not belong in the census table, so I moved it outside. See the talk page there for more details. Musashiaharon (talk) 10:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Musashiaharon, American Jews don't belong in the article at all. It's a religious category in the U.S, not ancestry, and even when it's used for ancestry, it's not necessarily about being Middle Eastern, and most of them are not considered to be such. A Syrian Jew is considered Middle Eastern, a Polish Jew is not. Maybe a few lines can be added about Mizrahi communities, but everything else is POV that has nothing to do with the census. Yuvn86 (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, you are entitled your point of view. I would be happy to answer your objection, except that this discussion has already taken place exhaustively on many other article talk pages, and I'd be adding nothing by rehashing it here. Of course, if you have any groundbreaking information likely to alter the consensus that Jews are Middle Eastern, please comment on the relevant talk page conversations, so that other editors can discuss it as well. I myself would be very interested, as I haven't seen anything new in this area for a long time. Musashiaharon (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the sources, and you and Jeffgr9 are simply adding wrong information - "Jewish" is not an ancestry category in the American census, let alone a Middle East one. In every country there are different definitions of ancestry, religion etc,. but this article is about Middle Eastern Americans and the American Census Bureau. You've added NOR and POV material that don't belong in the article, and need to be reverted. Yuvn86 (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Census does not presume to make a comprehensive list of ethnicities. By the way, have you ever been called up to the Torah? Musashiaharon (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get your point. You added obvious POV and OR material to the article, and as you probably know, that's not allowed in Wikipedia. Yuvn86 (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Somebody re-opened an old discussion in which you took part, and you are therefore cordially invited to partake in the discussion at Category_talk:People_of_Jewish_descent#Middle_East_category_Rfc. Debresser (talk) 13:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Withdraw RFC as poorly worded". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 9 October 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Withdraw RFC as poorly worded, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 05:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yuvn86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]