User talk:Yurik/Archive 2013
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yurik. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2010 | Archive 2011 | Archive 2012 | Archive 2013 | Archive 2014 | Archive 2015 | → | Archive 2020 |
Recently on Serbian Wikipedia your bot moved the page Икарус Орао IIЦ to Икарус Орао ІІЦ[1] and then changed this text in other pages (example: [2]).
This is incorrect since in this case II is Latin number 2 and not Cyrillic letters ІІ. I am now going to revert it.
I am not sure how could you fix this in the future - perhaps don't check for І since it isn't used in Serbian anyway. Nikola (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flower punctuation mark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
hello)
sorry to disturb you. is it possible not to fix file names like this [3]? it leaves red links behind. and it's a bit tricky to find --antanana 22:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- p.s. it's ok to answer here. or on my talk page back in ukwiki. thanks)
- Hi antanana, sorry the bot caused a problem. Usually the bot fixes red links into blue links. What might have happened, and it seemed to have been fixed, is that a file had incorrect filename (mix of latin and Cyrillic letters), and caused this issue. Once the file was renamed (and my bot should attempt to rename them, or at least notify), it started working again. Please let me know if I explained it properly. Thanks for keeping an eye out! --Yurik (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- уeah, you've explained properly. it's me at fault here. with my poor explanation)) i've fixed the problem with the file name on commons [4] and then wrote to you. so your bot can tag local files with uk:Шаблон:Перейменувати файл, can't it? and what about commons files? --antanana 10:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Flower punctuation mark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flower punctuation mark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower punctuation mark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 12:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
your perl snippet
Over here, I resorted to adding a link to a MediaWiki::API module on the CPAN - the snippet seems to be potentially discoverable in a web search and folks should know that it shouldn't be used (as the search results give a direct link to Perl section, having the user skip reading the big red disclaimer at the top). Then I realized it's in your user space: I hope you don't mind the line I added.. --Gryllida (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Gryllida, that page is so obsolete it's not even funny :) I think I should either archive it somewhere or delete it outright just so it doesn't confuse anyone :) You are welcome to convert examples to use the current API. --Yurik (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
I took the draft of the explanation of simple search using suffix tree and added another paragraph that gave an example. How does it look, please? RJFJR (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Replied.--Yurik (talk) 13:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Inactive bot on Chinese Wikipedia
Hi Yurik,
I noticed that your bot User:YurikBot on zh.wikipedia has been inactive for more than a year. Do you still need it?
If you wish to keep its bot flag, please let me know. If you no longer need it, or there is no reply in a month, the bot flag will be removed by local bureaucrat.
Regards, --Ben.MQ (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please remove bot flag - it was used mainly for interwikies. Thanks! --Yurik (talk) 03:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Inactive bot on nds.wp
Hello Yurik,
Your bot YurikBot is flagged with the 'bot' user-right on nds.wp. It has formerly been active with maintaining interwiki links. Thank you for your work! After the deployment of Wikidata there is no need for interwiki bots anymore. If you plan to use your bot for tasks other than interwiki maintenance in the future, please go to your bot's local nds.wp userpage and state what kind of tasks your bot will do in the future. Otherwise the bot flag of your account will be removed one month from now. If you don't plan to use your bot account on nds.wp anymore you don't have to do anything. If you want to keep your bot flag to do other tasks but don't plan to start with these tasks immediately please post a road map on your nds.wp userpage. If you signal interest in keeping your bot flag but fail to take up activity in the time until three months from now, your bot flag will also be removed. Thank you for your understanding. --::Slomox:: >< 14:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please remove bot flag - it was used mainly for interwikies. Thanks! --Yurik (talk) 03:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Uklanjanje bot zastavice / Removal of bot flag
(Bosanski) Želim da vas obavjestim da je se na bs.wiki donijela odluka da se uklone bot zastavice kod neaktivnih i/ili interwiki botova. Vaš bot spada u najmanje jednu od ove dvije kategorije. Ova odluka je donešena zbog zbivanja oko Wikidata koje je dovelo do toga da su interwiki botovi postali nepotrebni. Ako želite da zadržite vašu bot zastavicu onda možete podnijeti taj zahtjev ovdje sa dodatnim informacijama o poslovima koje bi bot obavljao i na koji nacin. Imaj te na umu da ovo treba da bude konkretan i koristan posao za zajednicu da bih se zastavica zadržala. Ako imate bilo kakvih pitanja kontaktirajte me na mojoj stranici za razgovor. Ukoliko ne reagujete na ovu poruku ce se uklanjanje zastavice izvršiti nakon nekoliko sedmica. Medutim, uvijek ste dobrodošli da podnesete novi zahtjev za bot zastavicu.
(English) I want to inform you that on bs.wiki there has been a voting that resulted in accepting the removal of bot flags for inactive and/or interwiki bots. Your bot has been identified to meet at least one of these criteria. This decision has been made due to the new developments with Wikidata by which all interwiki bots have become unnecessary. If you want to keep your bot flag, then please report that here by indicating what new task your bot will be performing and how this will be done. Note however that this has to be a concrete and useful task for the community before it will be accepted. If you have any questions, please let me know on my talk page. In case of no response, the removal of the bot flag will be performed within a few weeks from now. However, after that period you are always welcome to file a new request for a bot flag.
-- Edin(r) 01:23, 27 april 2013 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edinwiki (talk • contribs)
- Please remove bot flag - it was used mainly for interwikies. Thanks! --Yurik (talk) 03:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)