User talk:Yulemorelli

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frick Collection and Frick Art Reference Library WikiProject (October 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frick Collection and Frick Art Reference Library WikiProject.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yulemorelli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Starting a Wikiproject

Dear Yulemorelli: Here is information about the process of starting a Wikiproject: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals and Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide.

Improving articles about notable items in the Frick collections is a worthwhile goal. As a person who works for the organization, you will have to be very careful not to use this Wikiproject to promote the organization itself, because this is against Wikipedia policy as a conflict of interest.

Notice that a Wikiproject is a group of people, so you need to gather some other interested editors before you create the project, and then there is a specific process described in the articles above.

In the meantime, I recommend keeping the material you have gathered on a page in your user space, and use it to organize your own work. You'll have to remove the word "Wikiproject" from the title to save confusion. I will be glad to help you move it there if you want me to. — Anne Delong (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback Anne, I have added the other participants and published the page as an project page! — Yulemorelli (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having worked out a better place for your WikiProject page, it would have been a good idea for you to go back and request deletion of your false start. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if I make a mistake in the future, how would I request deletion of an article that was denied creation? — Yulemorelli (talk) 23:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bewildering canon of speedy deletion tags but all you need to remember is the basic {{db}} tag. Just enter {{db|reason for deletion}} and providing your reason is reasonable, the page will get deleted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you!Yulemorelli (talk) 14:17, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barometer Clock

Just a small quibble: if your subject is called "X", and there's no other article on the page titled "X", you don't need to add further identification in parentheses. Accordingly, I've moved the page you created, Barometer Clock (Boulle), to Barometer Clock. Otherwise, it looks like a solid new article. Keep up the good work! —Swpb^talk 21:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]