User talk:YukiLuvzbou

Hey Yuki, I don't what happened to you, and I doubt you'll ever read this, but please consider coming back. You were a very good member of Wikis when you wanted to be, and you were always someone that I liked talking to. You were a cool girl, and Wikipedia just isn't the same without you! Uncle Tech 03:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't been on in a while :( ~ Yuki

It's fine, I pretty much have left as well. However I would like to talk to you somewhere other than here too. Tech43 (talk) 07:48, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello YukiLuvzbou! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 272 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Miki Mia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miki Mia

The article Miki Mia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet notability criteria. Basic biographical information, like DOB, is unavailable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jay Dubya (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry - you are obviously a talented writer and your contributions to Wikipedia are valuable. In this case there just aren't enough sources to justify a separate article AFAICT (and I did my best to find them before nomination - the only sources the article has other than IMDB I added personally). The content is still good and shouldn't be removed; I think it should just be moved to 40 year old virgin. Anyway, just a proposal, and I welcome your feedback and hope you have time to discuss. Jay Dubya (talk) 12:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]