User talk:YrwannaHommV

April 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ GB fan 15:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YrwannaHommV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was asked to redirect page Tatiana Naynik to Nu Virgos no sources. I thought I should make the username the same as the Heroes V name hero Yrwanna, but clearly didn't think that through. Now that I understand Wikipedia's policies better, I'd like to try again. I want restore page Misha Romanova and Erika Gerceg. I founded sources to page Misha Romanova. Please unban me. YrwannaHommV (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is for sockpuppetry, which is the abusive use of multiple accounts, and your request doesn't mention that at all. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YrwannaHommV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First, I want to apologize for the disruptions on Wikipedia. It was not my intention. I am only here on Wikipedia to improve and contribute to it for free, not to cause any damage. The account "YrwannaHommV" is for a roommate of mine, and it could be the reason behind the IP address conflict. He started the account a while ago, but he did not have time to commit to editing on Wikipedia. Since everyone is in quarantine now, my roommate was looking for something to do, and he got back to Wikipedia, and I was personally trying to take him through the steps about how to edit on Wikipedia so he can get started. However, he did a mistake and accidentally deleted the issues that was added by User:GSS. He tried to undo it, but it was too late, GSS has seen it by then. Another point is that I was trying to edit the page myself as well, and this is how sockpuppet was defined since it looked like both of us are editing the page at the same time. Again, I want to deeply apologize about this, it was not my intention, and I promise that this will never ever happen again. I understand what caused the issue, and I strongly apologize about it. I will make sure to not have Haywon123 interfere with Musiclover20199 or vice versa. Please let me know if you need any further information so I can prove it for you. YrwannaHommV (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe that this is a good faith unblock request. SQL ^{Query me!} 17:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have some questions:

This appeal seems to be written by the point of view of someone other than YrwannaHommV, but is posted by the YrwannaHommV account. Whom wrote this appeal?
What is the name of other account?
Do you and the other account also share the same computer?
I believe that you have also been editing logged out. Are you able to explain that? SQL ^{Query me!} 15:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This looks to be nearly identical to the request at User talk:Haywon123. Are you able to explain? SQL ^{Query me!} 15:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YrwannaHommV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not violated sock abusing multiple accounts please unban. YrwannaHommV (talk) 02:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are either trolling or lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. Either way, this is the end of the line here. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to Daughter Of The Malassa? ~ GB fan 02:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daughter Of The Malassa) — Preceding unsigned comment added by YrwannaHommV (talk • contribs)

That answer does not make sense. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.