User talk:Youtubeer Aus

Welcome!

Hello, Youtubeer Aus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as JessWeiir, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JessWeiir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JessWeiir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 09:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Wikipedia. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gorgak25 (talk) 11:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at JessWeiir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:35, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User:Yunshui‎, you may be blocked from editing. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 13:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JessWeiir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JessWeiir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Demonstrating notability

Your article is under threat of deletion because it offers no evidence of notability. Your sources are: another Wikipedia page and three upload sites to which the subject has uploaded videos. None of these meet the criteria for reliable sources, which must be independent of the subject, reliably published (i.e. not uploaded to the internet by god-only-knows who) and offer significant coverage - more than just a sentence or two. Provide such sources, and I'll happily remove the deletion tags myself. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is also not a reliable source. Please read this page for information on how to identify appropriate sources. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nor is Tumblr. If you won't even read the policies, I can't help you. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:55, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request

Hello. You asked about an article about a YouTube user; I assume it's the one mentioned above.

Basically, the problem is that Wikipedia articles should be about subjects that are already big and famous and stuff. Wikipedia has articles about YouTube personalities, but those are generally people who have already been discussed elsewhere in media.

Articles generally should be good enough so that people can maintain them independently. So if you want to just create an article to show it to her, that may seem like a good idea at first, but then you need to remember that other people need to find reliable information about her, and that may be problematic unless she's been discussed in wider media. This is especially important in biographies. People can't trust just any random hearsay about people, right? That information has to come from people who we know have quality standards. And if the sources aren't marked, people will not know what to trust.

Hope this clears things up; I've barely had coffee. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

~~well it may be a biography of a living person which is against the rules~~

Grizzly1110 (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the above. Biographies are allowed on Wikipedia but the person you are writing about must be notable and the information must come from reliable sources. Hope this helps. Cheers, Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 02:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]