User talk:Youtalkfunny

Welcome!

Hello, Youtalkfunny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Schizoaffective disorder. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lova Falk talk 19:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schizoaffective disorder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of mood disorder-free psychosis, since it would be impossible to distinguish from schizophrenia).<ref name=News-Medical/><ref name="Schizoaffective_in_the_DSM5"/> (See [[#History|History]] for

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For the much-needed improvements you've made to schizoaffective disorder. Thank you for your hard work! Firecatalta (talk) 02:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schizoaffective disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DSM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up

I ran the general fixes and followed it up with the citation bot. This at first may seem highly unusual and look like I am deleting references, but it is actually combining the duplicate citations under a single reference name; it makes checking the references easier. The next part is the expansion; citing additional information from those references including additional authors and adding additional links to the content in the DOI listings. Doing these changes represented about a 10% reduction in the size of the page while improving its referencing. Hope you like it, you will see that the changes also make future referencing easier. If you have a problem, please undo them and do as you wish, but I think you will notice the reduced loading and processing of the pages and the improvements to the referencing as more than useful. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering

Since you seem to be an expert in the field of mental disorders, I was wondering if you could point me to some good places that I can grab some sources for dyslexia. That article is a mess and I want to fix it up a bit. I don't have access to much; but I can likely get them with some effort through the Wikipedia resource exchange program and my local library. As it stands; the dyslexia article is not really comprehensive and a bit rough - it is also an extremely important article. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

Welcome to Wikipedia. We write a little differently here then in many academic venues. For example per WP:MEDRS we use secondary sources rather than primary ones. This articles [1] while likely peer reviewed is not a review article or secondary source.

Also pleases read WP:MEDMOS. We are writing for neither patients nor fellow MD and thus do not generally use terms like "patient" but rather say "people with X". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now for the silly

Since you've seen what I did with DVT, how about you also see this? ;-) In other words, don't be intimidated by a large project like rewriting a long article. That's a big job! Sometimes we can find smaller articles to start or existing articles to touch up. I also started prothrombin G20210A from scratch. Anyhow, welcome! Feel free to play around with things, because you can't break articles. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

	The Cure Award
	In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]