User talk:Yourmanstan

Federal Reserve System editwarring

FYI - you are beyond the [[WP:3RR] revert limit on the Federal Reserve System article. 1, 2, 3, 4. Do not readd the material without getting concensus on the talk page. Multiple editor have repeatedly disagreed with you about the SAME edit in the past. Any more reversions and I will post this on the edit war noticeboard. This is not acceptable. Ravensfire (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the rule... I have reverted exactly three times, and no more. Having yourself and one other disagree with me is no more justification than the fact that several others do agree with me. Secondly there is new information which you crystallizes the issue which you disregarded. I will revert tomorrow or try to find some other compromise if you all do not make some accommodation for reality. Thirdly, Your and Dark Charle's actions very closely match the characteristics of WP:GANG and is not acceptable. If you all do not find a fair compromise then I will bring it to the attention of the administrators' noticeboard.

I refactored your post on the talk page purely to make things a bit easier to read. For whatever reason, when you start a line with space, it ends up getting formatted really odd and doesn't screen wrap. (whatever reason is asking the Wiki developers what the @#$@$ were you thinking with that design choice!) I used the {{quote}} template to replace it. You basically just type {{quote|<quote text here}} for a quick and dirty version. If you look at the quote template, it's got some more options you can use. As far as I could tell, nothing was removed from your post, just the reformatting. If I did delete anything, I sincerely apologize for it. Just trying to make it easier to read the quotes you added~ Ravensfire (talk) 04:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated :) Yourmanstan (talk) 04:48, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring warning / Donald Trump

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Donald Trump. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is an unfair and untrue characterization of my good faith edits. I've provided very clear explanation for the edits which are grounded in the consensus wikipedia policies. I've also tried in good faith to understand and accommodate others' concerns which appear to be stonewalled without legitimate arguments or wikipedia policy. Therefore I have sought dispute resolution to help guide us all. Yourmanstan (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Politics of Donald Trump

Why are you changing sections to subsections on Politics of Donald Trump? This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. MB298 (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't "want" to do that... it is exactly as it looks on the main Donald Trump page which I'm doing to try to accommodate others' complaints from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Trump#Undiscussed_split Yourmanstan (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, thank you for your edits on the Politics of Donald Trump page. If it is need to copy in the content from the main Donald Trump page again, I'll try to fix the headings as you correctly point out. Yourmanstan (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yourmanstan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]