User talk:Youngshawty

Yung Berg

Sorry about the warnings, I was too hasty. We would appreciate it, however, if from now on, you would cite some sources for content that you add. Thank you very much. GlassCobra 23:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yung Boss Records

A tag has been placed on Yung Boss Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 00:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, note that you may not remove the tag yourself, instead place

{{hangon}}

directly below the tag, and explain your position on the talk page. Victao lopes (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Big Kuntry King, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Big Kuntry King is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Big Kuntry King saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. brew crewer (yada, yada) 01:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in In The Hood

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on In The Hood, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because In The Hood is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting In The Hood, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Agreement (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Agreement (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Agreement (album). Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 03:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Poe Boy Entertainment

A tag has been placed on Poe Boy Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 03:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brrwawall

I'm suspecting you're that user because your edits are similar to that user. Hi anyway, here t stop your vandalism. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 03:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Young Jeezy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast (talk) 13:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street Money

A tag has been placed on Street Money, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Please do not add unsourced content to wikipedia, otherwise you will be blocked from editing. `'Míkka >t 02:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly adding unreferenced information. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Spellcast (talk) 05:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Look What You Made Me

A tag has been placed on Look What You Made Me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. haz (talk) 22:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Look What You Made Me. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. haz (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Plies (rapper), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rappingwonders (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked for 1 months for ignoring the requests to follow wikipedia rules and do not add information without references. `'Míkka >t 00:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cassie Ventura

Regarding Cassie Ventura: please see Template:Infobox Musical artist for information on who should be listed in the "Associated acts" field. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]