User talk:YoungVenus

Welcome!

Hello, YoungVenus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Basilique Saint-Epvre de Nancy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Epvre Basilica moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saint Epvre Basilica, does not have enough sources and information as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It also needs content in the body of the article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Natureium (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Basilique Saint-Epvre de Nancy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Basilique Saint-Epvre de Nancy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. In addition you have linked to your own scan of a copyrighted document. It's OK to cite it, but not to link to a photo of it. It really needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]