User talk:YoungIreland
|
An invitation to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! YoungIreland,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
|
|
|
– Lionel (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Youth Defence
[edit]You need all of the information in the source, not just one portion. :) --Errant (chat!) 22:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited N69 road (Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Camp United has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Loh Tae Kwong
[edit]Hello YoungIreland,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Loh Tae Kwong for deletion in response to your request.
If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Catverine (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sheriff Y.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Clontarf
- St. Mary's A.F.C. (Cork) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cork
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Beggsboro A.F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cabra
- Carew Park F.C. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Roxboro
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of St. Brendan's Park F.C.
[edit]The article St. Brendan's Park F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability...
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Killarney Athletic
[edit]The article Killarney Athletic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Killarney Celtic
[edit]The article Killarney Celtic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability...
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:22, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Killarney Celtic for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killarney Celtic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killarney Celtic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Killarney Celtic Logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Killarney Celtic Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:2015–16 Premier League table, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- You may want to read the BBC Sport article that says Watford clinched promotion to the Premier League after they beat Brighton and other results went their way. [1] QED237 (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- OK QED237, I see the link and accept that I was in the wrong. I made my assumptions via Flashscores, which apparently did not update the Championship table correctly. No hard feelings.YoungIreland (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- I can understand you dont like the warning, but even after being reverted you insisted on removing them when several other users has insterted Watford. You should have realized you might have missed something. But I might have been to fast to warn for disruptive editing (not vandalism), sorry about that. QED237 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose at the time, I though it was them who was doing the disruptive editing by repeatedly adding Watford when the Flashscores table, as well as the Championship had not yet been updated (the former I was surprised with, as they are usually quite reliable.), and thus I reverted what I (mistakenly) thought was disruptive editing to both the page and the table. Regarding the vandalism, I was referring to this link:
- I can understand you dont like the warning, but even after being reverted you insisted on removing them when several other users has insterted Watford. You should have realized you might have missed something. But I might have been to fast to warn for disruptive editing (not vandalism), sorry about that. QED237 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- I noticed that in your note that you did make the distinction, which was fair enough, I suppose when I saw this link I was shocked and reacted accordingly. I hope I didn't come across too strongly, this is only a misunderstanding from which I hope we can both move on. YoungIreland (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- That protection request was not because of you (and it would not even have worked since you are autoconfirmed), but there has been many other unsourced edits adding Everton, Palace and so on for next season. QED237 (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- OK QED237, thanks for that. I suppose that given that the request was made at the same time when I was making my edits, it was an easy mistake to make, sorry. YoungIreland (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- No problem. Have a nice day! QED237 (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Listowel Celtic F.C.
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Listowel Celtic F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — CactusWriter (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Spa Road F.C. for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spa Road F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spa Road F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A2soup (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Repost of Classic F.C.
[edit] A tag has been placed on Classic F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Listowel Celtic F.C. for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Listowel Celtic F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Listowel Celtic F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 RFL Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitefield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoang Anh Gia Lai – Arsenal JMG Academy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages V-League and Hoang Anh Gia Lai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Ways to improve 2016-17 Irish Premier League season
[edit]Hi, I'm Snowycats. YoungIreland, thanks for creating 2016-17 Irish Premier League season!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey there, great job writing a new article! I did mark your article as it needs some improvement, but I'm sure that it will be one of the many amazing articles on Wikipedia soon enough! If you have any questions, feel free to let me know! Good luck!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Snowycats (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Invite to the African Destubathon
[edit]Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, YoungIreland. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, YoungIreland. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, YoungIreland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Kerry F.C.
[edit]Hi Young Ireland,
Just began working on a draft article on the new Kerry soccer team ahead of their potential entry into the First Division next season, and as I saw you've an interest in Tralee Dynamos, you might help with improvements/filling in the historical background to flesh out the page. Look forward to hearing from you. Culloty82 (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Culloty82,
- Certainly, if you'd like to provide a link to the draft, I'll see if there is anything that I can add.
- Kind regards,
- YoungIreland (talk) 08:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies YoungIreland,
More than happy to do so now, just didn't see your note until today!