Jump to content

User talk:YoungChristian1995

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
my IP Address was blocked. I'm using a public Wi-Fi nearby a coffee shop and it says It is blocked by sock puppery? by bbb23. Asking for help po....
You'll need to provide your IP address to see if you are qualified for IP block exemption. Alex ShihTalk 04:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CFC Youth for Christ (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address I'm using right now is currently blocked from editing, help, please. It says I'm using a "web host Provider" while I'm using the same public Wi-Fi in the coffee shop where i created a draft article. I have no other way connecting to the internet where I currently conducting a social experiment for my thesis. thank you.

(YoungChristian1995 19:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC))

This user is currently at SPI as a probable sock who has repeatedly attempted to create CFC Youth for Christ under various titles. Please seeWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnathan Osorio Meters (talk) 20:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This account has been created to evade blocks on other accounts. It has probably been created by the same person who used one or more of those accounts, but even if it was a different person it was someone working with the previously blocked editor to help evade the effects of previous blocks, which amounts to the same thing. Such use of account to get round blocks on existing accounts is not permitted by Wikipedia policy, so this one has been blocked too. Instead of repeatedly creating new accounts to try to post a page promoting your organisation, which you know will just be deleted just as the previous versions were, why don't you spend your time on something which actually has a chance of success? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you claim to be a Christian, don't you think it would be better to stop lying and trying to deceive us in order to get your way? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YoungChristian1995 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for that, JamesBWatson, Yes, This is an account created to evade the previous blocks. But please consider that there are still thousands of youth out here who are a member of that organization who may create the same article with exact title anytime. furthermore, may I invite you to please conduct a personal research about the organization "CFC Youth for Christ" why I believe in its existence? and why we informally creating something, not for our own? Also, It is not my intention to deceive you and your fellow editors. I admit that I just know little about using Wikipedia that is why the previous account was compromised. May I promise that this will never happen again, and let me ask for unblock? Thank you for your kind consideration. (YoungChristian1995 17:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Thank you for admitting this is a sock account evading a block. And no, you cannot use Wikipedia to promote your organization, period. Both reasons are enough to decline this request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.