User talk:Young.benjamin

Possibly unfree File:Ventriloquist Andy Gross with McElroy dummy.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ventriloquist Andy Gross with McElroy dummy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ventriloquist Andy Gross with McElroy dummy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ventriloquist Andy Gross with McElroy dummy.jpg, which you've sourced to see info. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 04:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello, Young.benjamin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ukexpat (talk) 04:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Andy Gross

Hi, Benjamin! Welcome to Wikipedia. We are glad you have decided to join the cadre of Wikipedia editors. I wanted to give you a few tips about the above referenced article waiting for review at AfC.

Your reference 1, the one to the emails you have sent back and forth with Mr. Gross, is not a valid reference. All encyclopedias, print ones like World Book or online ones like Wikipedia, are what are known as "tertiary sources". That means that everything we publish has to be referenced to some other published work. Your own research, which of course correspondence with the subject of the article would be, is not allowed. The applicable policy for this is WP:OR.

Your article appears to me to have enough references to reliable sources (see WP:RS) to show notability for Mr. Gross. For a beginner writing their first article, especially when it is a biography, that is rare. The applicable notability policy for performers is WP:ACTOR.

You put a hyperlink in the article referencing the toy company he owns with his brother. You should remove that, as hyperlinks in articles are discouraged and you also have it in the external links section, which is fine. You should, however, remove the external link to his Facebook page. It is referenced on his personal webpage you have linked, and that link is sufficient. Links to Facebook, while not expressly prohibited, are frowned upon. Referencing to Facebook, however is expressly forbidden.

Now the bad news...all the content you have referenced to the emails will need to go. Any of it that is not asserting some "claim to fame" or is in no other way controversial, you could reference to his personal website if the info is there. If you can find a second-party source (again, see WP:RS), you can use that for a reference. But if there is no reference for it, you should remove it. I'm thinking especially about the things you referenced to emails about his kids. If they have been in TV productions, there should be some sort of reference to that on IMDb. BTW, IMDb is not considered a very reliable source either, due to the fact that it is user edited. But if all you are referencing is someone appearing in some production, it will generally not be contested.

Because of the WP:OR issue, if I were to review your article right now, i would have to decline it. You can still work on it, even though it has been submitted for review, but if it gets declined before you get a chance to do so, no worries. Just fix it up and resubmit it!

Please continue to use Teahouse, it is a great resource! I would have left long ago if it were not for the patient help from the people there. I am a host there, and since this answer was an answer that pretty much applied only to the article you are working on, I messaged you here rather than leave this wall of words on the Teahouse page. Sorry for the length, but if I can be of any further help, just let me know or come back to Teahouse. Happy Editing! Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Andy Gross.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]