User talk:Yosu2010

Welcome!

Hello, Yosu2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jafilia

Looking at the Jafilia article, the key thing that could be done for the article is to provide sources for the article that are independent and reliable. Blogs—which is where the Merchant Circle review is published—are generally not reliable. If the software's been reviewed by Wired or one of the major magazines/websites like that, that would be independent coverage.

If you can find independent coverage, please add links to it. Otherwise, I'll be nominating the article for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that. I will try to find bigger 3rd party validation. Any way, I doubt any "wired" size magazine would review such an unimportant piece of software. I would like to point out that the the Joomla Estensions Directory or JED has strict rules of admitance and the mere fact that the component is listed there is a recognision of it's value for the Joomla community. Aditionally, the component is reviewed in the official Virtuemart newsletter and also listed on the Virtuemart Extensions Directory. The JED and the VMED are widely unknown for the general Internet user, but are very important in the "Joomla Universe". The point I try to build is that the relevance of tiny things is not possible to prove with big endorsements but with related and relatively important sources. What I am not sure about is if that principle of relativity applies at Wikipedia or is compliant with the "first pilar". --Yosu2010 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jafilia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jafilia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jafilia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — TORTOISE WRATH 21:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]