User talk:Yonidebest

Hi,

If you have any questions, remarks or accusations, please leave them here or at my other talk page.

Thanks, Yoni

Removing Hebrew links?

I can't read Hebrew, so I am wondering why you are removing links for various theme park articles? --blm07 20:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Becuase those Hebrew article ceased to exist - they were moved to the main article. Regards, Yonidebest 20:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hi, does this mean you are withdrawing your nomination then?- TwoOars 20:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does. Thanks, Yonidebest 21:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong interwiki spread by your bot

Hi, I've tried to fix a wrong interwiki, but your bot has put it back in place. I'm referring to Bloch_wave linked to es:Ecuaciones de Bloch. The former is the wavefunction for an electron in a solid, while the latter is an equation to describe magnetisation interaction with a magnetic field.

The interwiki is wrong on many wikipedia, can you fix it in all of them?

As far as I know all the interwikied pages refer to the former concept, but the spanish one. The correct spanish page would be es:Onda de Bloch (as can be inferred from here) but it does not exist yet.

thank you! 147.122.5.216 (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Err, OK. I removed the link manually from the related pages. Yonidebest Ω Talk‏ 21:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot question

Hi Yoni! Is there a way to force your bot to skip certain pages? For example, it added an incorrect interwiki to Battle of Nitzanim, and will likely do so again, because the Hebrew article's interwiki links here. Is there a "magic word" to prevent this or do I have to revert the bot manually each time? Thanks, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 05:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

manually - definitely not. I will search for a solution. Yonidebest Ω Talk‏ 22:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral good

I've reverted your change and explained on talk page. PamD (talk) 08:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editnotice, and your sig

Hi
I've answered at WT:Editnotice#Adding this feature in other wikipedias, but also wanted to let you know that your signature is coming out garbled:

[[User:Yonidebest|Yonidebest]] Ω [[User talk:Yonidebest|<font color="#{{SUBST:ס:#switch:{{SUBST:#חשב:{{SUBST:#זמן:s}} mod 12}}|0=DAA520|1=006400|2=0000CD|3=8B008B|4=9370DB|5=2F4F4F|6=A9A9A9|7=DDA0DD|8=87CEEB|9=9ACD32|10=808000|11=BDB76B|12=00FF7F}}">Talk</font>]]‏ 08:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The substitution is broken, probably because the templates and parser functions are called differently here. Also, there's apparently a RTL character somewhere in there, which gives the date a pretty much unreadable look for us LTR people. :)
Cheers, Amalthea 09:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I didnt notice. I copied it from my he.wiki sig. should be fixed now. Yonidebest Ω Talk 10:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops, forgot to translate "#time". now it should work. Yonidebest Ω Talk 10:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and "#expr"... Yonidebest Ω Talk 10:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

finally :-) thanks. Yonidebest Ω Talk 10:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:) Amalthea 11:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Temporary_screenshot_problem2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Temporary_screenshot_problem2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

take a better look. it alreay has a license which i picked from the drop down menu, "{{wikipedia-screenshot}}". it's not fair use, but free (and anyway temporary until the problem is fixed). Yonidebest Ω Talk 12:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bot activity on the Dutch Wikipedia

Dear,

Your bot account hasn't made any edits on the Dutch Wikipedia for at least three years. In accordance with the local bot policy the bot flag will be removed in three months. To avoid losing the bot flag, you can confirm you want to retain the bot flag by going to this page.

With kind regards, Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may remove it. Yonidebest Ω Talk 20:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yonidebest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Temporary screenshot problem2.jpg

The file File:Temporary screenshot problem2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]