User talk:Yongjianrong

Image copyright problem with File:Entranceofjurongpoint.jpg

Image released to the public. Yongjianrong (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution to the Swine Flu table

Really thanks for your recent updates to the swine flu table, but I've spotted something which would improve the article a bit more:

For the recent change in Colombia, you have placed the reference within the HTML comments. Please make it using standard citing format (as shown on Wikipedia:Citing_sources/example_style#Websites) so that it can be verified.

For the change for China, could you replace with your own reference? The current one is from Chinese MOH and does not show the numbers you have changed. Also please note that we keep China, Taiwan and Hong Kong as separate entities for the figures in which WHO pours all of them into a single one.

Just my 2 cents and welcome to Wikipedia. - Xavier Fung (talk) 01:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you can try following the link above for the proper citing format. If you are editing, simply scroll down the edit box and follow what the other entries do. This would really help improving the verifiability and avoid misleading potential readers. - Xavier Fung (talk) 01:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also as a reminder, always leave messages to the bottom of other's talk page. :-) - Xavier Fung (talk) 01:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links H1N1

also a lot of important links are now deleted by your editing . As example the link to the Canadian Health Goverment:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.131.185.78 (talk) 02:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This evening you have been consistently adding the wrong nunber for the United States (along with Sweden and New Zealand. 1) You have been adding the WHO total (cumulative) number to the WHO newly confirmed number, thus arriving at a very high and incorrect number. Please stop until you know what you are doing!!!!!Sqlman (talk) 03:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "cumulative total" (column 2) includes the number from the 'Newly confirmed since the last reporting period' column, so your US number, for instance, is 4638 too high... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sqlman (talk • contribs) 03:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have mistakenly read the WHO bulletin and sum up the cumulative cases (total cases) and the newly reported cases. Please read carefully before editing. Also the US numbers are updated from US Swine Flu outbreak table and NOT from WHO bulletins. Please take notice for these and update the numbers properly. - Xavier Fung (talk) 03:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Case

WHO often lags behind in the report of cases, as every health ministries may not report to WHO daily, nor WHO releases bulletin every day. This worsens especially during and after the weekends. The precedence of references is official bulletins from each MOH > WHO bulletins if the former one has more updated figures. This also applies to news reports. We can update the figure quoting media references, but once there are coverage by official bulletins, the reference should point to official ones.

So for SG we would follow the press release from SG MOH.

If you have any questions regarding the update of figures, please leave your message on the talk page of the Template before actually doing so. The table needs to be as accurate as possible, so any "mistakes" would give false info to our readers. Ask before you do if you are in doubt. - Xavier Fung (talk) 03:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more editing reminder: If you are not very familiar with the editing of the article (like the format of the templates), you can try using Sandbox or create a subpage in your user page. This would avoid lengthy edits to get what you need. Thanks. - Xavier Fung (talk) 10:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide an edit summary for your edits

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. HumphreyW (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yongjianrong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Batok Road

The article Bukit Batok Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks any sources or references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Entranceofjurongpoint.jpg

The file File:Entranceofjurongpoint.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]