User talk:Yolupuki

March 2011

DMacks, I appreciate your help with this. There is now a good citation for the Cape Wind Greenwashing example. Yolupuki (talk) 13:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound is hardly a WP:RS, and your inclusion of Cape Wind on Greenwashing appears to be an original synthesis of the facts even if the premise you describe were to be true. DMacks (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of App-show

Hello Yolupuki,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged App-show for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TankThank (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of App-show

The article App-show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced neologism - appears to be a trademark for one company's app - not a commonly used term

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]