User talk:Yogendra kushwaha

October 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Koeri because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 07:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia pages are not own. If you have a specific question, pls discuss it here.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kushwaha. If you continue any form of disruption again, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 19:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 19:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and no willingness to edit in a collaborative environment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 20:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello plz unlock me......You lock me ,actually i don't understant who are you that's why this problem is created

Hello SpacemanSpiff I wanna unlock from you .Because misunderstanding w/n thats way this problem is arise with you.Actually i edit kushwha wikipedia page with correct information that it's deserved.But other user edit with incorrect information regard kushwaha.I understand you from them that's i edit your page.sorry! for this .And unlock me Plz.