User talk:Ynm010

November 2024

Hello, I'm TheWikiToby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to San Marino have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheWikiToby (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viktor Gyökeres. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 21:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ynm010! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ernest Nuamah, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ynm010, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheWikiToby (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ratnahastin. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Arne Slot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ynm010, please keep it more neutral, more encyclopedic, and less exuberant. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I just reverted you on Islam as well, besides a host of other articles--please stop with the little factoids about the bestest, the fastest-growing, etc, based often on questionable sources and written into the articles in a less than elegant way. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am stopping you to give you a chance to read over the comments by other editors on your talk page, to read the edit summaries provided by editors who reverted your edits, and to consider what exactly it means to edit neutrally on a collaborative project. You can't just make so many edits which clearly are not agreed upon by so many editors without addressing their concerns. Drmies (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging User:Ratnahastin, User:Willondon, User:TylerBurden, User:TheWikiToby, as an FYI. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They continued to add unsourced content despite my warning, I'd say it's a good block. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is this set of edits part of the problem given the username is very similar to the one being blocked today? Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]