User talk:Yndesai/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Yndesai. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Proposed deletion of Yamaha PSR-403

The article Yamaha PSR-403 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third party sourcing or assertion of notability. Not every product is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova³⁶⁰ 07:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nature Club Surat (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Yndesai, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 03:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Yndesai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Yamaha PSR-403, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Durova³⁶⁰ 07:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for warm welcome

Its gr8 pleasure being at Wikipedia. I have just started small edits and have found few topics specific to India where I will like to contribute. Again appreciation for contribution by all the Wikipedians.

(Yndesai (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC))

Articles I edited

These are some of the articles I have edited. Yndesai (talk) 04:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nature Club Surat has been accepted

Nature Club Surat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 21:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your nice note--I would normally reply on my talk page, but I was unexpectedly away for a few days, and didn't get a chance to reply there before your reply was archived. Please let me know if I can be of assistance, or point you in the right direction here. Welcome! --j⚛e decker ^talk 07:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Jain

Sir, I understand the point made by you. ASI journals mentions many temple of being Jain temple originally.ProudJain 08:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Got it, Thanks.Jain 04:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)(discuss)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purna Wildlife Sanctuary has been accepted

Purna Wildlife Sanctuary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great (Global) Backyard Bird Count (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great (Global) Backyard Bird Count and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Backyard Bird Count has been accepted

Great Backyard Bird Count, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 22:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yndesai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! Im currently rebuilding the WikiProject Investment.

Since your a member of the project/were one I wanted to ask if you were interested in helping me re-start the project.

I already am pretty much finished with updating the project page.Take a look at it. Ping me if you want to help! Thanks. WikiEditCrunch (talk) WikiEditCrunch (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yndesai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yndesai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the belated welcome message. But it is needed now because you don't seem to be familiar with the policies of Wikipedia mentioned there. Please take some time to review them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks you brought it up again so let's read the sequence. Neutral Point of view comes before reliable sources. Though your emphasis is well received that quoting reliable sources help to protect your edit. One need to be bold enough to state Neutral point with citation needed tag rather than keep quoting one point of view everywhere.-- YN Desai ^Discuss 03:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

To invoke "neutral point of view", you need to first read and understand the WP:NPOV policy, and explain how the policy applies here. You can't equate "neutral point of view" with "neutrality in my opinion". Your opinion is of no consequence on Wikipedia. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DBig Xrayᗙ 05:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

user:yndesai/refs

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--DBig Xrayᗙ 20:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@DBig I have already read the notice on Talk page. It clearly says in this sequence,

(1) Be bold but not reckless, (2) Try to Improve article, (3) Write from neutral point of view (now this point is in bold) Lastly (4) Include citations.

Wikipeida editors have reversed the sequence which has impacted quality of article,I am trying to make them bold enough to improve article. Rather than scarring them hope you will help in this effort. -- YN Desai ^Discuss 03:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Yndesai, please read the message I posted again. And also click the link to understand what it means. DBig Xrayᗙ 03:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

No consensus for adding faq in CAA article --DBig Xrayᗙ 04:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Xrayᗙ There may not be consensus on content or success of FAQ. But FAQ was issued is fact and is very much related to the CAA article. -- YN Desai ^Discuss 05:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Yndesai, read WP:Consensus DBig Xrayᗙ 05:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)