User talk:Ylime

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Ylime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.117.20.128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: Per checkuser - Jessica L. again

Blocking administrator: Dominic (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: No unblock is needed; enjoy spending time with your friend at her house, and edit Wikipedia when you're back at your own house. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

I am at my friend's house. She is banned. I have created this account a long time ago. I know I haven't established myself as an editor yet but I promise to do productive edits with this account. I have been reading Wikipedia for years so I think I know how to be a good editor. Since Wikipedia assumes good faith especially on new editors, this unblock shouldn't be a problem. Emily (talk) 14:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably just enjoy spending time with your friend, then, and edit Wikipedia at home. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably edit at home? Is this policy? I haven't read anything about this. But Wikipedia's guidelines requires users to assume good faith. Just because I am at the banned user's house does not mean I shouldn't be allowed to edit. Its like saying someone who lives at her house can't edit either. Emily (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's bad manners to ignore your host and play on the computer, when you're a guest. Also, I'm quite certain that you are the banned person, yourself. If I'm wrong, then there's no harm in waiting until you get home; Wikipedia will still be here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I did ask her for permission. There is nothing wrong with using the computer at my friend's house. Emily (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Ylime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.117.20.128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: Per checkuser - Jessica L. again

Blocking administrator: Dominic (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You'll just need to wait until you get home. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request another unblock. The admin before was completely in violation of Wikipedia's guideline. Emily (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admin- if by chance you don't see the obvious give-away that this is the Jessica Liao, ask me via private email- I'd hate to tell her what she's doing to make it so clear, because then she might stop doing it next time. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am her friend. And to think that this is Jessica is not assuming good faith. Emily (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will edit from another IP address. Then I will establish myself over there. And then can I come back here and edit? I am staying at my friend's house during my vacation. Emily (talk) 16:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, because it is fairly clear that you're the same person as Jessica, I'm going to go ahead and block this account directly. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ylime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

FisherQueen is not assuming good faith. The other admin said to use another IP address.

Decline reason:

If you are Jessica, which seems very likely, you are long term not welcome here, as you know. In the event of your not being Jessica, edit when you get back home.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ylime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Anthony.bradbury said to edit on another IP address. How can I edit on another IP address if FisherQueen has already blocked me? In other words, you need to unblock me so I can edit. I am telling you that I am not Jessica. I have already gone to another IP address.

Decline reason:

Quite honestly, your account might not have been blocked directly if you had let the first unblock request go once it was declined. But you continued to raise the issue, suggesting that the connection was more than incidental. So, Fisherqueen directly blocked your account, and I think that was a reasonable decision. Nothing in this request mitigates the facts of the matter. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 21:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock me. I will not let Jessica get onto this account. I will protect this one. I will edit productively. I will not cause any problems. Please just assume good faith. I am not her. Emily (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is accurate; I have indeed directly blocked this account as an obvious sockpuppet, so Jessica will not be able to use it from any ip at this point. I think that a brief review of the list of other sockpuppets will reveal the similarity with Jessica's naming pattern. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of people have their names in reverse. I don't see how mine should be an exception as being a sock of Jessica Liao. If all of you assumed good faith, none of this would have happened. Emily (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]