User talk:Yitbe/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Proposed deletion of Arun Raikar

The article Arun Raikar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, arguably a case of WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 07:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Reply Hello Rosguill, I don't believe the article has such problem. If so, you should also review Liew Thow Lin too. - Yitbe ^A-21 06:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Of the three sources currently provided at Arun Raikar, [1] is an unreliable tabloid, and the other two fail to include author bylines, which are generally considered a bare minimum for establishing reliability. I tried looking for more sources but was not able to find any of higher quality, hence the deletion nomination. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Rosguill, there are a plenty number of video corroborations; for instance you can watch these: one, two, three, four,… - Yitbe ^A-21 06:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Those are primary sources, not exactly the kind of coverage that we should be using to write articles. At any rate, while I stand by my perspectives, I don't think this is worth arguing over and I will not be renominating the article for deletion. There is no need to discuss it further. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)