User talk:Yitaoyu
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lynne E. Maquat (October 13)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lynne E. Maquat.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 16:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
|
Hello! Yitaoyu,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at AfC Lynne E. Maquat was accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
There is actually some major work that remains to be done.
- I accepted the article because as a member of the NAS, she clearly meets the requirement for WPPROF. But I removed the section on her research, because the footnote numbers embedded in it made it unmistakably clear that it had been copied from some published source. We do not do that. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously; and does not accept material copied from other sources unless it is in the public domain, or released to us under a free license (It is, by the way, not necessary for pages to have a notice to be copyright: everything published on the internet or elsewhere is copyright to the owner of that content unless specified otherwise.) It might be possible to get permission, but there is no point in doing so-- the description is a little too technical to be ideally suited for WP,and it It is therefore better to rewrite. You must also Close paraphrase.If you base it on a single source, you must cite the source, but also changeg not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas. Be sure to make links to pertinent WP articles on subjects mentioned for additional background. I would also suggest putting much less emphasis on her work as a grad student and post doc than on her own independent work since then--it is that subsequent work which led to her notability .
- There is some basic material missing: date and place of birth, dates of her degrees, appointments following her postdoc, all with dates. A link is needed to her full CV, if it is on the web, not just to her personal summary page. It will also help somewhere to give a list of her most cited papers.
These matters are important. Were it not for the NAS membership, I would probably have not bother making the extensive format changes I needed to make, and instead, as reviewing administrator, deleted it entirely for copyvio.You must fix the problems, and do this very quickly.
- You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, but make sure they are quaolity contributions ,avoiding cpyvio--and learn our citation style. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you need any assistance, please ask directly on my user talk page, and I'll respond either there or on your talk page in a day or two.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 07:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)