User talk:Yhtak2014
Your submission at Articles for creation: Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 (October 21)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Yhtak2014,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 (October 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Yhtak2014. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Federal Prison Reform Act of 2013, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ironholds (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013
[edit]Hello Yhtak2014. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smarter Sentencing Act of 2013, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican and Mike Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smarter Sentencing Act of 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Durbin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Smarter Sentencing Act of 2015, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Hugh (talk) 13:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC) Most of us reserve the minor checkbox for edits that do not change the meaning of an article, and add or remove very few characters. Thanks! Hugh (talk) 13:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Carlton, Oregon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Yhtak2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Recidivism Reduction and Public Safety Act of 2013 for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recidivism Reduction and Public Safety Act of 2013 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.