User talk:Yh00157

March 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nördic Nightfury 06:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you continue to mark edits as minor when they are clearly major? El_C 06:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user has just returned from a previous block for the same offence, having been warned countless times, see his user talk page before he blanked it. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly ignoring warnings not to mark your edits minor and continuing to do so after a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yh00157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am Korean. I was interested in railroads and edited because I wanted to change the old contents to the latest. I have no idea why I did this.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you have not provided any reason to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Yh00157 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17927 was submitted on Mar 31, 2017 08:07:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the actions of 211.223.237.185 may need examining. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, strong overlap there. I've blocked that IP address as Yh00157 is clearly using it to evade their block. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yh00157, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nightfury 14:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yh00157, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SK2242 (talk) 04:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]