Thanks for your contributions to the Phonetics page. Please understand that linking to discussion forums violates external linking guidelines (see WP:EL). These links will likely be removed during regular link cleaning. If you would like to discuss the issue further, you can start a new topic on the Talk:Phonetics page.Nposs02:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your link to the academici forum also violates the "conflict of interest" policy - see WP:COI. Please desist from replacing this link. Nposs03:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
That is,
while co-articulating /GC/S/abT speaking posture (which means another automatic co-articulation of /GC/P/abT),
if trying to speak/articulate (not "David Letterman" but) "Letterman David" from/with English /S/+bp speaking posture,
"Mister David" is metaphthong/MPh pronounced.
And,
while co-articulating /GC/S/abT speaking posture (which means another automatic co-articulation of /GC/P/abT),
if trying to speak/articulate (not "David Letterman" but) "Letterman David" from/with English /S/+cp speaking posture,
"Master David" is metaphthong/MPh pronounced.
That is,
when speaking "Letterman David", if articulating "L" from/with English/Cyrillic /C2 speaking posture and articulating "-etterman David" from/with /GC/S/abT speaking posture, "David Letterman" is metaphthong/MPh pronounced.
"Letterman David" >> ("Mrs. David Letterman" /GC/S/abT)/S/P
While "씨/[Si]" is phonetically corresponding with "Mr." and "가/[Ga]" is phonetically corresponding with "Master",
(male) Koreans/laborers jokingly use "가/[Ga]" only to (male) friends, since "가/[Ga]" can give negative feeling of slave or sham.
"군/[gun]" is (formally) used by (much) senior/elder persons in addressing or referring to (much) junior/younger male children or male teenagers.
"양/[yaŋ]" is (formally) used by (much) senior/elder persons in addressing or referring to (much) junior/younger female children or female teenagers.
"여사/[yΛ sa]" is phonetically corresponding with "Mrs."
While co-articulating Japanese speaking posture,
if trying to speak/articulate "김 용완 [Gim ŋ(io)ŋ ŋ(oa)n]" from/with Chinese speaking posture,
"김/[Gim] 여사/[yΛ sa]" is metaphthong/MPh pronounced.
And,
while co-articulating Japanese speaking posture,
if trying to speak/articulate "김 용완 [Gim ŋ(io)ŋ ŋ(oa)n]" from/with Chinese /Ch speaking posture,
"김 용완 [Gim ŋ(io)ŋ ŋ(oa)n] 여사/[yΛ sa]" is metaphthong/MPh pronounced.
These facts shows that Korean, Chinese and Japanese languages are closely related; possibly, Chinese and Japanese languages are dialects derived/separated from Korean language.
"김/[Gim] 씨/[Si]" (or "용완 [ŋ(io)ŋ ŋ(oa)n] 김 [Gim]") >> ("Mister 김 [Gim]" /S/+bp)/GC/S/abT
"김/[Gim] 가/[Ga]" (or "용완 [ŋ(io)ŋ ŋ(oa)n] 김 [Gim]") >> ("Master 김 [Gim]" /S/+cp)/GC/S/abT
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese honorifics. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Hello: I am blocked like below (by Materialscientist), with no expiry set. My main interest/concern is phonetics/linguistics. So, I hope to introduce my homepage (* Comparative phonetics ) at External links of the article "Phonetics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonetics#External_links_and_references", but Materialscientist seems to refuse discussion/forum on blocking me. Materialscientist will know who I am. But I don't know who Materialscientist is. It is unfair. Current world/university (& Wikipedia) phonetics/linguistics theories have many significant defects/errors; but they refuse discussion/talk. I am the most active writer/researcher/scientist in the world on phonetics/linguistics. Young-Won Kim ygwnkm@yahoo.co.kr Comparative phonetics http://voicespec.com/board.cgi?id=test1http://voicespec.com/ --- below --- You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are now not able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from Ygwnkm has been blocked (disabled) by Materialscientist for the following reason(s): Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes: and other disruption This block has been set to expire: no expiry set. Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and E-mail other editors and administrators.
Decline reason:
You are blocked because you were asked to stop adding links to voicespec.com as it's WP:SPAM and not a valid WP:EL. You continued to add it. As such, we have had no choice but to prevent further disruption/advertising by invoking a block. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Your reason here Ygwnkm (talk) 01:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC) BWilkins said : Decline reason: You are blocked because you were asked to stop adding links to voicespec.com as it's WP:SPAM and not a valid WP:EL. You continued to add it. As such, we have had no choice but to prevent further disruption/advertising by invoking a block. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC) But I want adding links to voicespec.com/board.cgi?id=test1 (NOT voicespec.com) Who are you? Who BWilkins is? You know who I am. Don't you think you are coward who attack me anonymously??[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
your reason here Ygwnkm (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
BWilkins said:
Decline reason:
You are blocked because you were asked to stop adding links to voicespec.com as it's WP:SPAM and not a valid WP:EL. You continued to add it. As such, we have had no choice but to prevent further disruption/advertising by invoking a block. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
=================================
But I want adding links to voicespec.com/board.cgi?id=test1 (NOT voicespec.com)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom unblock appeal
The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock at this time. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.
