User talk:Yewlongbow

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 17:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Check out your user page!

Edits to Hugo Chavez

Hola, Yewlongbow. Welcome to Wiki! I'm having a hard time sorting out some of the sections you added to the Chavez article, and others are inquiring about a reliable, referenced source for the racism statements. Even though we know something to be true, it can't really be added to an article without a reference. Hope you'll have a look at the talk page concerns here: [1]. Saludos, Sandy 22:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Search Agency

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Search Agency, [2] has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Search Agency. Thank you. --A. B. ^(talk) 21:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Matta II

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article George Matta II, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Sarcasticninja (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have answered your question about the Bisa people/Bissa people on the talk page for the article titled "Northern Province, Zambia"

Hi Yewlongbow - just to let you know, I posted an answer to your question about the Bisa of Zambia and the Bissa of West Africa. In short, they are two totally separate groups, but just happen to have similar names. Here's my posted answer in full:

"These are two distinct groups. There are the Bissa of West Africa and the Bisa of central/southern Africa. They speak totally different languages and have totally different histories. But their names look very similar! There are many cases of very different, separate, unrelated "ethnic groups" on the African continent that have similar names, or even the exact same names, so don't feel bad at having been confused! Indeed, in Africa often each "ethnic group" or "tribe" will have multiple names that refer to the same group, and these multiple names often are totally different from each other. (For example, you might come across a reference to the Luo people, who mostly reside in East Africa, in countries like Kenya and Tanzania, or the same Luo people might be referred to as Lwo, Jaluo, Joluo, Dholuo, or Kavirondo. All these names -- Luo, Lwo, Jaluo, Joluo, Dholuo, Kavirondo -- pretty much refer to the same group of people.) If you want to learn more, you could try looking at the website "Ethnologue," which tries to compile and list all the different names for the same linguistic groupings: that will confuse you for sure! Here are Ethnologue's "language family trees" for the Bisa of central/southern Africa (http://www.ethnologue.com/show_family.asp?subid=1059-16) and the Bissa of West Africa (http://www.ethnologue.com/show_family.asp?subid=491-16). As you will see, the two languages have very different linguistic roots." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.25.216.240 (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yewlongbow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yewlongbow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]