User talk:Yeshua Ha'Mashiach

Yeshua Ha'Mashiach is an user made by three siblings. Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (talk) 23:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Yeshua Ha'Mashiach. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 03:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Yeshua Ha'Mashiach! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mz7 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mz7 (talk) 03:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding shared accounts

Hi Yeshua Ha'Mashiach. I noticed that your user page says that you and your siblings share this account for editing. Unfortunately, sharing an account is not allowed on Wikipedia, as we expect that each account represent the contributions of one unique individual. Accordingly, please stop sharing this account. I would change your password and urge your siblings to create brand new accounts, one for each of them, then edit your user page to clarify this change. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

OK thanks Mz7 I will go ahead and use it only myself Believe in Yeshua Ha'Mashiach My real name is Jason Manners Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jason! Mz7 (talk) 03:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Chapo

Hello Yeshua Ha'Mashiach,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Great Chapo for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Muhammad has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Muhammad was changed by Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957367 on 2017-04-04T17:10:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allah. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Allah was changed by Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927007 on 2017-04-04T17:11:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Chapo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Great Chapo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaither the old english sheep dog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaither the old english sheep dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Taylor Mason, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Allah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Talk:Islam.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Taylor Mason. -- Dane ^talk 17:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Won't do any religious attacks again Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It wasn't religious attacks that caused your block, it was all of your edits, including the creation of multiple nonsense articles. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.