User talk:Yellowy cake

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Yellowy cake. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jawwad Durrani Talk to me 18:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solvated metal atom dispersion has been accepted

Solvated metal atom dispersion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fun with WP:SECONDARY

Hi nice to see your edits. If you are editing for fun, I encourage consideration of WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY. Wikipedia guidelines recommend reliance on reviews and books. The guideline is highly relevant in chemistry and materials science. Newish editors tend to underestimate the scale, and to some extent, unreliability and narrowness, of primary literature. If you need any advice, feel free to ask.--Smokefoot (talk) 12:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]