User talk:Yellow Man 1000

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yellow Man 1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JamesBWatson#Request_against_vandalism (other administrator gave me the permission make this edit)!!!!! Yellow Man 1000 (talk) 1:56 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

You clearly missed his tone there; he was implying that YOU were the disruptive editor. And he was correct. It's also why he pointed you to BOOMERANG. only (talk) 19:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Only: Oh dear. I suppose I really shouldn't try humour, in case it doesn't get appreciated. Yellow Man 1000, I am sorry that I misled you. I didn't intend to, but it never occurred to me that anyone might interpret my message as being permission to continue with your edit warring. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]