User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive28

Marathi vs Kannada

Hi, Thanks for ur reply.I would certainly forward u any content dipute I might have.Thanks for enforcing NPOV in Solapur and Akkalkot.Mahawiki 11:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Seuna page trouble ahead

Sir, looks like the same guys (Mahawiki and Arya Rajya whatever) have come together with another person and have removed a lot of sourced material from the Seuna page and are in a high handed manner trying to redirect elsewhere. Also sourced info about Kannada from the empire had been tagged and/or renmoved and references to research by many scholars removed. I have reverted the page to where it was a couple of days back. I have indicated that no major changes can take place without broad consensus and discussion. Needless to say, Mahawiki is getting the job done by someone elseDineshkannambadi 01:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Dinesh u should had confirmed who was that 'another person' before complaining it here! Mahawiki 03:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

An evening with Jimmy Whales

I thank you for your message: [1]. There's a set of photographs posted here by Ramu, one of the participants. Regards. --Bhadani 16:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Something more. --Bhadani 17:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Mark Foley scandal

This article is getting hit by new IPs: Mark Foley scandal. Might need some semi-protection. --Arbusto 01:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

done. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Need your input regarding sockpuppetry template

Hello, I hope I'm not interrupting anything. Please kindly see this discussion and post some inputs to settle a disagreement regarding wikipedia policy on sockpuppets and the sockpuppet template. It would be much appreciated. Thank you! zephyr2k 03:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you so much! You have my gratitude. Take care. zephyr2k 04:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete your userpage? BhaiSaab ^talk 04:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

A mental "break". It will be back when I am fully back. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Category:Hopf algebras

Hi Blnguyen. I wouldn't call myself a "professional mathematician" yet, but I definitely agree that Hopf algebras are a subset of Quasi-Hopf algebras. What this mean for categorisation probably depends on how you look at categories - should Category:Hopf algebras contain only things specifically about Hopf algebras, or generalisations as well. If the generalisations were "notable" enough to have their own categories, then I'd say they definitely shouldn't be in the Hopf algebras cat, but otherwise, you could look at it either way. As for Australia being a Hopf algebra place, it was definitely a surprise to me to find many people editing these articles! JPD (talk) 13:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your invitation in the WikiProject Cricket.I am glad to beame a part of it.Tarif Ezaz Bangladesh 17:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Baka "sockpuppeteering"

Please explain how Baka used sockpuppets. I genuinely do not understand how his actions constituted sockpuppetry. Thank you, DRK 19:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

A second account is a sockpuppet. He didn't gain an advantage by doing so in this case, as he didn't evade blocks, team revert or team-vote. He did use it to attack another user and both accounts were held responsible, so it was not treated as throwaway as he was held responsible. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Good to see you fighting trolls again. I dont know how a throwaway account constitutes a sock, though the Muslim guild may think otherwise. I also am not honoring dab's request, mainly because he's been racist, rude and incivil towards me.. Bakaman _Bakatalk 22:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not honoring it mainly because it comes from him. I'm not really much of a harrasser myself, though being a Hindu is harrassment enough or certain users.Bakaman _Bakatalk 01:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Does that mean you will use socks? Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Of course not, you think I didn't learn a lesson from my throwaway acct? No that means I'm not listening to any more of dab's incivil and rude comments. Like I said before, I think being a right-wing "chatterbot from the BJP headquarters" is harrassment enough for him.Bakaman _Bakatalk 04:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Ikonoblast/Holywarrior

He's been talking crap about you on Hkelkar's checkuser. [2].Bakaman _Bakatalk 22:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

You seem to be too concerned..Do you expect something in return? BL is able to look for himself TerryJ-Ho 23:51, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Kaveri River

Hi, hope that you shall come back wiki-rested. I am unprotecting above page protected by you. In case, I find edit wars or similar problems, I shall again protect the same. --Bhadani 22:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Admin.sxc

I am getting an error when launching the extracted file. Could you show it to me in another format? - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Awesome. You are very umm... whAt caN i sAy reaLly... meticulous! :) - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crzrussian (talk • contribs)

Softblock

What do you mean by a softblock? Do you mean one that blocks anons only? JoshuaZ 04:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, he is using a shared IP, which is a problem.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Portal Maharashtra

Hi Blnguyen, thanks for setting up the Portal on the great nation. But I have some queries. Is there anything we can work on in this portal. How can we add value to this portal. I don't know much about portals, infact, this is the first portal I am visiting. Is there any way to participate in the portal just like I did in Wikipedia:Wikiproject Ethnic Group. All in all, Is there any way I can help or add value in this portal ? Thanks again. - AryaRajyaमहाराष्ट्र 04:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes there is a lot to be done. Wikipedia:Featured portals gives you a good guide. Portal:India is featured and that gives a good model. Ideally, the visual stuff can be improved. The biography is not a Featured Article, so it would be good to have a featured article for the biography as the Ambedkar article is not featured. Ideally, we would have a selection of featured articles, biographies, and pictures, and then you can have article/bio/pic "of the month" and put them on a rotation policy. Also, it's good to keep on creating new articles, so that we keep the DYK and NEWS section up to date, fresh and dynamic. Eventually, we should also put a noticeboard type section at the bottom and list of notable topics and articles to draw attention to current Maharashtra projects (As is the case in the India portal). Regards, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for ur msg.I dont know exactly what's portal but I will refer to above.Thanks for being active again.I dont mind Kannada tran. if at all Seunas (Yadavas) had it as offical language.But i really doubt the citations of a particular writer which a editors puts forth for all his edits.IMO Mr.Kamath (the writer) is controversial and lingual fanatic. It will be a relief if admin enforce NPOV more assertively.Thanks! Mahawiki 05:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Sango123

You to me: Yes, she is a 15 year old female. Check her userpage. It surprises a lot of people initially. Most people are surprised that a 15 year old can be so calm and intelligent.

No no, I meant I always thought that Sango was a male. Now I know Sango is a female. So you are back in action! --Bhadani 08:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I have taken a fancy for you, particularly because I do not know anything about you (and, you continue to be an enigma wrapped in mystery) except that you are a superb wikipedian. On 29th September 2006, we had a marathon meeting with the president: An evening with Jimmy Wales: [3] - [4] --Bhadani 09:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Deepu's RFA

Hi, Deepu emailed me regarding his RFA. He said that you are also thinking of nominating him. If that is so, then you should be the main nom, and i'll be the co-nom. This is because you are a much experienced and respected user than me. If that is fine, then just edit out deepu's RFA, and put me as a co-nom. Hope to hear from you. --Ageo020 (talk • contribs • count) 17:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it will be ready in a few days time. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Removing contents from Talk page

Hi BInguyen, I had seen removing personalized discussion between editors not relevant to the article from you in this edit. Based on those lines, I had removed the personalized talk (attacking on couple of other Editors) here. This was followed by another editor reverting this change and calls me Vandal (in the edit summary). May I know how different is my edit and your edit? and I am interested to know how it can be vandalism? Thank you - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 19:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Just observed your this edit. Thank you! - KNM ^{Talk - Contribs} 02:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey

Check out these lovely comments I just got on my talk page. Ah, the beauty of Wikipedia. ;-) —Khoikhoi 01:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thx for the congrats. Happy that last week went well and that you were able to take advantage of the experimental/theoretical divide. My exam was just to officially be able to call myself a "sub-specialist" in GI medicine (I had my specialty exams 1.5 years ago). Only special because they were the last exams ever. Hope all is well -- Samir धर्म 02:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Much Appreciated

Thanks very much for the barnstar, though I am hardly tireless. I must dash now but I'll be in touch again. All the best. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Protecting against edit wars

Full protection should be a temporary measure. If users are edit warring, they are obligated to stop and if they do not they can be blocked. Full-protect blocks everyone, when it is only a few aggressive offending parties causing the trouble. They, specifically, can be prevented, and semi-protect is sufficient to keep them out. They are of course free to behave. —Centrx→talk • 22:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

As far as the pages which I protect, mainly the Indian religious disputes, I strongly feel that the protection is the better option as it is always the same group who are always warring, and not thrid party collateral damage. As such it is better to lock the page as the users involved also have skills at article writing and it would be better to divert them to some more productive editing rather than lock them out completely. As for the Falun Gong stuff - those guys are incorrigible and do little else than fight, continuously and indulge in irrelevant flaiming on the talk pages. I am also astonished that you delete the {{deletedpage}} after two weeks and the pages are sometimes recreated. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Low time periods would not be a problem for that, and part of the effectiveness of a block is not that they are prevented from editing during that time period, but that at any other time they will also be discouraged from edit warring lest they be blocked. Regarding deleted pages, the vast majority of these are not re-created, and the reason I unblock some relatively recent ones that have only been re-created during a short period of time is because, working on the other end, there was a huge backlog that only grows and grows because no one cleans up the deletedpages, and they do prevent the creation of legitimate pages. —Centrx→talk • 03:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Mallya Aditi

Hi, are you in any way connected with Mallya Aditi International School (MAIS)? Dr.rajkumar

No I am not. I have never been to India. I simply removed stuff that was unencyclopedic. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Request

When you have time, can you please check whether Mihir Bose has modified any of these in the second edition.

1. The MCC tour of 1930-31 (& a SAF tour) was planned in a trip to England in 1928 by RE Grant Govan and Anthony de Mello. Appears in page 61 in the first edition.

2. Birth place of Vizzy (in the list of cricketers in the appendix). Vizianagram as per 1st ed.

3. The year in which India joined ICC. In p.61, it reads "By the time India was admitted in the Imperial Cricket Conference in 1929, the impetus was gone"

Tia, Tintin (talk) 06:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Vizianagar is the same place. If the journey was in 1928 and "to" England (I may have misread it as "from"), it may lead to messy issues about the year in which India joined the ICC (This, the last part of this, and this contains the background).

The A in TA Sekhar stands for Anathanpillai, which is often written as two words. That will explain the TAP. Once upon a time Kumble used to get listed as Anil Radhakrishna Kumble (Radhakrishna Kumble being his father). They may have removed the middle name somewhere along the way ! Tintin (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Checked the first edition which says the same thing that you have quoted. Fixed it in the de Mello article. In an attempt to avoid errors, I left it a little ambiguous. Tintin (talk) 05:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Does your library have a book named 'History of Indian cricket' by Edward Docker ? It was published in 1976 but he was an Australian, so I am just wondering ... Tintin (talk) 08:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it has five books by this chap, but all are about Bodyline and Bradman. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

In case you

Hello. In case you want to do it: [5]. For next few weeks, I may not be very: active. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm sort of hoping that other people will keep their eyes out so that I only have to maintain the articles which I wrote, which is unfortunately not the case. I don't know anything about Maharashtra really, and mainly plastered the portal together from whatever the featured material was available - as for the needs of the Maharashtra WikiProject, I would not know what the core topics and high priority would be. Perhaps wait for the return of Nichalp. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Srebrenica massacre

Please investigate possible immediate responses regarding the IP address 68.126.253.36 Someone using this IP address is gutting the Srebrenica article from this IP address that has never been used before on wikipedia. Thank you. Fairview360 00:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't seem like a problem yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blnguyen (talk • contribs)

{{importance}}

Hi, I remember a while back you were working on clearing the backlog on this template. User:Tizio, has got DumbBot reporting on the age of tagged articles here; if you're looking for something to do, I'm redirecting, proding or AFDing anthing thats had the tag on it since July; help would be appreciated. --Peta 04:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I will help surely once I get less busy. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Protected

Hi. You forgot to put the protected tag on Bajrang Dal after actually protecting it.Just FYI.Hkelkar 05:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Blnguyen

Hopefully someone will checkuser them soon. DVD+ R/W 02:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:RfA

Well, I hadn't known you were open to running again. You have another offer. A deep and meaningful Ramadan to you too. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 03:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a million (for both the Ramadan greeting and the offer). I'll probably wait two more weeks, as I'm just too busy at the moment. -- tariqabjotu 03:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

'umble

Checked the Kumble issue. Looks like Wisden never used his middle name. In the Who's Who in Indian Cricket, he appears as "Kumble, Anil Radhakrishna" until 1994. There is no middle name from 1995 onwards. Tintin (talk) 08:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

There are Sikhs who don't wear turban and are clean shaven, who are called "Mona Sikhs". Harvinder Singh apparently is another (it is hearsay; can't put it in the article). Tintin (talk) 09:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Bonus Stage

I noticed you had deleted a page for "Bonus Stage" which was uncontested after a 5-day waiting period. I'm dismayed that I ended up looking for it a mere few days later only to find it deleted. I would have loved to be able to contribute to it or see it in it's previous state, and wondering what could have been done to save it, or if it's possible to resurrect. If so, what would need to be done to it to keep it alive? Thanks! Frankenroc 21:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I would normally just move it to User:Frankenroc/Bonus Stage so you can keep a personal copy, but in this case, we have a copyvio. So I can't. Sorry. Feel free to redo it though. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I failed to mention that it was protected from being recreated as well...

User Page

I think someone has vandalised your user page... why isn't it working? (JROBBO 05:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC))

No it hasn't been vandalised. I deleted it. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Why? Can't you just have it blank? (JROBBO 05:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC))

Total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess

You might like to join us at Physics/wip where a total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess. At present we're discussing the lead paragraphs for the new version, and how Physics should be defined. I've posted here because you are on the Physics Project participant list. --MichaelMaggs 08:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Fuck is not swearing

To be swearing it must be a profain oath. Fuck shit bastard cunt etc are not swearing. Oh Dear, By God and bloody hell of course are.--84.9.211.57 11:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Banned User:Irate floating across IP range. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

LOL. Grandmasterka 20:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Martin Donnelly

Hi there. Thanks for reminding me that I forgot to include the references in the article (done now). All of the references refer to Donnelly also playing Rugby for England. If you want something specific, give me a hoy and I'll dig it up for you. Cheers. --Roisterer 15:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Nah, I've nominated it at Template talk:Did you know. Hopefully Peta will put you on the main page in a day or two. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Block of 84.9.193.208

I noticed that you recently blocked this user for incivility and personal attacks. In one of his edits ([6]), he claims to be banned user Irate. The IP matches the range of this user. The style and knowledge of policy makes me wonder if his claim is true. Should the block be extended? I'm not really sure how to handle this situation -- I'm still a baby admin. Thanks! -- Merope ^Talk 20:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I guess it would depend if the IP range is shared. If it isn't then we can't really range-block and take out a whole bunch of people, unless you do an IP block only. Else, feel free. I hadn't noticed that he declared himself a banned user. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

RfB With A Smile :)

RfA

Hi there; I just proposed User:Melchoir for adminship, with his approval. I know that you had nagged him to go for it, but you said you were on Wikibreak. Sorry if I have stepped on your toes.--Anthony.bradbury 21:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I am addicted though, so I am still about. I added a co-nom. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Good. I know that there a body of opinion against co-noms, but I like them; it shows greater support than just a support comment--Anthony.bradbury 13:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Hkelkar's comment

Here-- the comment "Looks like the ji(had)g is up." by Hkelkar.

I added the section POV tag (here) to the Muslim Caste section and explained my reasoning on the talk page. Hkelkar subsequently reverted it and countered it on the talk page, which is where he stated the above comment. I classified it as a personal attack, as it implied jihad on my part. Hkelkar denied that it was a personal attack directed at me (here). Do you think this would constitute as a personal attack, incivility, or neither? Thank you, and have a nice Wikbreak! Mar de Sin ^{Speak up!} 22:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes it was not a personal attack per WP:NPA because the comment was on the content and not on the contributor. I did not address the contributor by any person in that sentence but was making a generic statement about the content of his edits. Basawala was not the subject of the sentence as defined by the rules of high school English grammar.If you can provide a line of reasoning that is within the scope of wikipedia policies that establish the sentence as a personal attack then please inform me and I will apologize to Basawala.Hkelkar 22:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Ad hominem comes to mind..and it appears like an obvious attack. Consider that a last warning for personal attacks/incivility. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

OK. I will apologize to Basawala.Hkelkar 19:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Misuse of Defawn Template

HKelkar introduced a warning template on my talk page for my edits on Narendra Modi page that s/he has subsequently removed.Please refer to these edit summaries.I believe this is a very objectionable and intimidating behaviour specially in reference to a personality whose actions and inactions as a Chief Minister of an Indian state are very well documented in the world media.

Can you please revert these false templates from my talk page and also restrain this person from intimidating other users TerryJ-Ho 14:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Looking. User:Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do, There is a lot of WP:NPA and WP:AGF violations by this user and is continuosly hindering peaceful editing by raking up historical non related stuff to influence other's opinions.I removed one such edit that was intended to provoke me after the user made a request for mediation TerryJ-Ho 07:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Pending your action I had removed this template which corresponded to misuse of the template by User:Kelkar.Now he has again pasted them with another [7].Please take action against him.He has provided no reason (valid or invalid) for pasting that templateTerryJ-Ho 10:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Bakasuprman's claim

cur) (last) 00:26, 13 October 2006 Bakasuprman (Talk | contribs) ("death to India" is not partisan? Pseudo-secular bakwaas) in the context of Narendra Modi page where he reverted my edits does not stand on any scholarly argument as I have hardly found that comment ascribed to them.Similarly the comment in Ayodhya page smell of original research.What is your perception? TerryJ-Ho 19:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

The last comment seems like personal analysis - although to be honest I haven't sat down and thought about the article or the background much. User:Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Deepu RFA

Hi Blnguyen, done... -- Lost^(talk) 09:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your arguments in my favour during my RfA, they were much appreciated. Yomangani^talk 10:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Advice needed..

Hello, Although i had opposed making a new article of Belgaum_border_dispute it was made after insistance of a user.As I had feared the new article is being again used to advertise Karnataka's stand.If u see and read the article u will find emphasis on Mahajan report which is anti-Maharashtra.Kannadi editors are taking advantage of the fact that all pro-Maharashtra sources are in Marathi.I have an important citation which I will to use to balance the article and also specify Maha's stand on border issue.But Kannadi editors are not allowing me to use the source without translation.I do know translation is needed for using non-English sources but do we have to provide a2z translations or only of the quotes used in article?Plz help!It is highly impossible to translate each and every article and the special issue of a Marathi newspaper which I intend to use.Morever Kannada editors will generously use Deccan_herald and other pro-Kannadi citations to push their POV.This will of course result into a biased article. Mahawiki 13:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

anti-Hindu up for AfD

I have worked very hard to keep the article at a high standard and have sourced all edits there, but User:TerryJ-Ho and user:BhaiSaab want it deleted. Do you have any opinion? Please contribute to the AfD.Hkelkar 01:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I've closed it as it as there is no doubt left in the debate and the only further thing happening is a lot of useless sniping. User:Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Blnguyen

The talk page of the page now linked to from your signiture had a message on it for you:

I got a message that I had been vandalising some page when I loged of. And I know for sure no one uses this system expect me. Please tell which page it is sot that I can confirm it. Thanks.rencin24

I redirected it here anyways, so it shouldn't happen again :D Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 05:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, User:Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Lindsay West on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lindsay West. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZlatkoT (talk • contribs)

Acknowledged. User:Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 06:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Tnx for the DYK medal

And glad to see you are still around, I thought you left when you deleted your userpage...-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  06:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the medal

At last! My command of completely useless trivia and random facts culled from all corners of the internet is winning me fame, fortune, and...er, yes

Seriously, though, I'm always glad to be of assistance. And I do enjoy looking for slightly unusual things to add whenever possible.

Thanks again! --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 07:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Two question marks

Hi Blnguyen, I've never edited DYK so I'm bringing this here. The Viipuri Municipal Library entry has two question marks at the end. Probably there should only be one? Regards, DVD+ R/W 01:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Just a minor typo, no big deal. The images have gotten much better since you had the genius idea of putting them at CAT:CSD. I can't get into posting DYK now, too much on the plate, I've also been working on images at the Commons ;-). DVD+ R/W 01:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Sarvagnya's vandalism

Dear Sir, He is removing his official warnings on his page and non-obscene msgs for no reason.see this thisand THIS.Morever as a revenge he issued me a warning for no reason HERE.Note that he has alleged me that I vandalise his page and given me a No personal attack' warning! Mahawiki 06:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please See this link too where sarvagnya himself had warned against removing official warnings.Mahawiki 07:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I also request u to allow me to remove the warning he gave me out of revenge. Mahawiki 06:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

@Mahawiki - I give myself the right to remove bogus and frivolous warnings especially when it comes from people with poor records for decency like you, Arya and Baka. First of all, in your warnings you do not even mention where my supposed indiscretion happened. All you do is keep harping on some supposed misuse of popups and you fail to mention where. Also THIS is an unabashed and shameless case of trolling.

Dear admin, I request you to take note of this never ending incivility of this user and block him. Please note that after you had blocked him, he has been blocked once more by another admin. Even then, his incivility has shown no signs of ending.

Also please note THIS and THIS on User:Jimbo Wales' own page. This is a clear case of misrepresenting others and trying to mislead the user/admin(Jimbo Wales(!!) in this case). This is nothing short of slander! Sarvagnya 07:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Blnguyen, its sad how a useless regionalistic debate has invaded every India-related article. I could care less about the Kannada-Marathi debate, but thanks to Sarvagnya, I have moved slowly Northward. You may wish to look at Talk:Saare Jahan Se Achcha where he has unilaterally reverted/vandalized the article 12 times in five days.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I stopped caring. Perhaps they will invade the Rahul Dravid page now as he is of mixed regioniticity. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

This is not done,admin! U seem to quick in blocking me but dont care to find who's troublemaker here.For the "N"th time let me request u to keep a watch on Belgaum_border_dispute.U have blocked me twice and IMO i think on both occasions it was unwarranted.

@Baka I am really concerned about belgaum_border_dispute article. It was a one-sided article before I stepped in. Now the user sarvagnya is not letting any stone unturned by badmouthing me on wikipedia noticeboard! I am not the guilty atlest on belagaum issue,why do these people hate Marathi so much.How can I allow these people talking mean about my language/state?

Mahawiki 06:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)