User talk:Yeet123

Joey Bada$$

Please do not use his stylized name as it might cause confusion. VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 01:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

     -He does not have a stylized name Joey Bada$$ is the correct usage of his name.

His stage name is Joey Badass his stylized name is name Joey Bada$$. Joey Badass would be the correct usage of his name. Please remeber to sign your response with four (~) in a row. VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 02:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

I personally know Joey. I think I would know what his stage name is and his stylized name is. You're wrong. Yeet123 (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Then you would know his stage name is Joey Badass and his stylized name of his staged name is is Joey Bada$$. Joey Bada$$ might cause confusion when you're referring to him that way. VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 02:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Please tell me how people will get confused if I'm referring to someone with the correct name. On his own website he is know as "Joey Bada$$". Yeet123 (talk) 02:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Joey Badass is the name of the article, and people would wonder why the names are different, also having his name stylized would look unprofessional. VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 02:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

But the thing is, his name is Joey Bada$$.... Anyone with a brain would know that he is known as Joey Bada$$. Also, his new album is called "B4.DA.$$" not "B4.DA.SS". Go to any website and he will be know as "Joey Bada$$" not " Joey Badass". Yeet123 (talk) 02:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Joey Badass shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You're edit warring (over something silly). You can take this up on the article talk page. Also, please be more careful where you drop your comments. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Joey Badass. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 04:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

This is not fair. I'm correcting a page's information. Yeet123 (talk) 13:49, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

• For this and this I've just blocked you for a week. Personal attacks of this nature are not acceptable. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation started for block evasion before his first block ended at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yeet123 Meters (talk) 18:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)