User talk:YeaYourMom

Please do not create attack pages as you did at Tina Mai. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 00:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Tina Mai. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. EW_{_i}kist^Talk 00:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, YeaYourMom, and welcome to Wikipedia. I looked at Tina Mai and found it to be completely neutral, believing that you did not create the page with intentions to disparage the subject. However, the article still may be deleted for not establishing notability. Hence, I advise you to add reliable references that are independent of the subject and that constitute significant coverage. Please see the general notability guideline for more information. Goodvac (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tina Mai for deletion

The article Tina Mai is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Mai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Corvus cornix_talk 00:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#When_is_an_attack_page_not_an_attack_page.3F. Corvus cornix_talk 03:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith

Your editing under your User name and under the IP, the fact that the IP comes from Floyd County, Georgia, the fact that you have yet to provide a single reliable source, all makes it nigh onto impossible for me to assume good faith. Sorry, I still think it's an attack and I still think you're a vandal. Corvus cornix_talk 03:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some pointers

Here are a couple of things that you will want to read before creating more articles about porn performers: WP:MFA, WP:RS, WP:BLP, and last but not least WP:PORNBIO. A lot of biographies of porn performers get deleted because they do not meet Wikipedia guidelines. Good luck. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for You have a questionable username, create a negative unsourced biography of a presumably living person as your first action, repeatedly flip back and forth between IP and logged in editing in the same debate, and leave the editor who called your misdeeds into question a rather snarky message. In short, there is absolutely no evidence that you intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. It's possible that you might change, though, so feel free to review relevant Wikipedia policies and explain why each one of the issues I've listed above is a problem in your unblock request.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jclemens (talk) 08:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]