User talk:Yattum

Feel free to leave me some comments.

Russian airforce

Your source, is total crap, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/av-main.htm has never been considerd reliable. Also take alook at the figures it gives! they add up to 2,588. Not the 1,715 that you say.

Fighters - 822 Ground attack - 600 Airborne Early Warning and Control - 16 Reconnaissance - 170 ECM - 0 Traning - 980

Total - 2,588

Also dude, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/av-main.htm dosent include Bomber aircraft, helicopters or transport aircraft!!!!!

Get your facts right Rademire2 (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-satellite weapon‎‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. G W… 23:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Anti-satellite weapon. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -MBK₀₀₄ 01:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Superpowers map 1945.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Superpowers map 1945.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357 ^talk 19:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The table on your user page

Out of curiosity, what does it represent? G.R. Allison (talk) 23:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. There's an article called 'Comprehensive National Power' if you're interested, it ranks countries by their influence. G.R. Allison (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fighter Aircraft Article

Just so you're aware, I didn't revert your last edit on the fighter aircraft article. I had copied both the edit summary and the article text and pasted both. I removed the Eurofighter and Rafale from the article because until they have an AESA radar installed, they aren't technically 4.5 Gen aircraft. Also, despite what you believe, my goal is not to express Indian nationalism (by the way you didn't respond to my talk page comment on the Anti-Satellite weapon system article). Thanks, Vedant (talk) 01:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

~~Just as an addendum, you're not supposed to remove block notices.~~

Based on the fact that this user has a history of edit-warring, an obvious bias and has engaged in serial sockpuppetry and is now indefinitely banned as a result, I am striking my comments out. Vedant (talk) 19:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thmc1

In case you haven't heard the news, Thmc1 was recently banned from editing on Wikipedia idefinitely. Knowing Wikipedia, this usually lasts until a willing SysAdmin comes along, or about 2 weeks. To prevent this from happening, you and other complainants may want to voice your objections by posting on Thmc1's message board as soon as possible. He has especially spent a lot of time wrecking havoc on nearly all of the Chinatown pages with anti-San Francisco Chinatown propaganda(he's from New York and feels that NY Chinatown is superior to all), but fortunately they were re-edited and restored by good, sensible Wikipedians. Hopefully, any SysAdmin who comes along to take up future unblock requests from Thmc1 will see these messages and think twice before setting him loose to continue preaching his bigoted views.

Bill —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lim Bill (talk • contribs) 17:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yattum for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Vedant (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring,sockpuppetry, personal attacks and threats of legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Banned

Per an AN discussion you are hereby community banned from editing Wikipedia. Courcelles (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yattum for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]