User talk:Yashiro 07

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ismail Ibn Sharif, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ismail Ibn Sharif, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did give a valid Reason to remove the previous claim because the majority of Islamic Sources contradicts the one single french source that was given to support an imaginary battle. Yashiro 07 (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have an article about the battle in question that is full of sources. Furthermore, you're literally contradicting the preceding section that mentions it. Please stop! M.Bitton (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's irrelevant to the matter, the provided sources are simply weak on that article compared to the sources i provided that completely make you french source useless, stop vandalising Moroccan articles, i know you are a desperate algerian trying to create a fake history. Yashiro 07 (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And i will make sure to rectify and correct that Article in question, don't worry ^^ Yashiro 07 (talk) 02:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ismail Ibn Sharif. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yashiro 07, in response to your latest reverts: it does not matter who is "right" or wrong. Once there is a disagreement over the article's content, editing on that issue must stop and editors need to work out a consensus. The status quo is expected to remain in the meantime. That is how Wikipedia works. If you are unable to come to an agreement and/or you believe the other editor is being unreasonable, please read through the available next steps at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. But if you continue edit-warring, you can be reported and blocked; in fact you have already violated the more specific three-revert rule, which means that if you were reported right now you would be automatically blocked, so take this policy seriously. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]