User talk:Yash4690

August 2024

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Charming, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yash4690 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link I added to [InnerMasteryHub.com](https://innermasteryhub.com/charming-woman-what-makes-a-girl-captivating/) is not promotional or advertising. It is an educational article without any commercial agenda. I apologize if this was misunderstood and commit to following Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward. Yash4690 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to submit an unblock request, please follow the instructions in the template above. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yash4690 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my account was blocked due to a misunderstanding. The link I added to InnerMasteryHub.com does not contain any promotional content or advertising. It is a neutral, informative article. I apologize if it was seen otherwise and will follow Wikipedia's guidelines in the future.

Decline reason:

Decline. The linked website is a poorly written sexist piece of trash, and its insertion on a dab page is very inappropriate. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jake Wartenberg, my sockfarm alarm went off. Drmies (talk) 14:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]