User talk:YaoiLover2360

October 2021

Hello, I'm Njd-de. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yaoi Press, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I’ll try to find more sources for the rest of the information I provided but for now I’ve added more information about the founder’s criminal charges with several sources. YaoiLover2360 (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Yaoi Press. Please see WP:BLPCRIME. Also this information seems to be irrelevant for the article. Instead of adding the content again, please discuss on the article talk page to gain consensus. Thank. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So the articles are not poorly referenced as they directly tie jnto the information I am attempting to add to the page. It is 100% relevant as it pertains to the company’s history. I do not see how it violates BLP guidelines as the sources also directly state the subject plead guilty to the charges/conviction. Thereby adhering to the guidelines. Controversy implies divisiveness. I hardly see how providing relevant information about criminal charges and subsequent guilty pleas are controversial. I will go ahead and add it to the talk section in the meantime but hope to see this information provided to the public as it should be. YaoiLover2360 (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eduardian, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do I not get to defend myself? This is not a sock puppet account YaoiLover2360 (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was instructed to examine different policies about the information I was attempting to add to the Yaoi Press page because I believe it relevant. I did not see how the information violated BLP guidelines and received no clarification when I asked.

I dug into the page’s edit history and found more detailed information on the same topic I was trying to provide and tried to submit it to the talk section for discussion AS INSTRUCTED. and now I am blocked? I have never seen or heard the name Eduardian before I found that information. I am not that person but I do share the belief that information is relevant to that page and have been blatantly punished for trying to discuss that, again, as I was instructed to do.

I would like my account unbanned as this is wholly unfair. YaoiLover2360 (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the instructions for appealing an unblock and disclose my whom you were instructed per WP:COI Star Mississippi 14:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was told to read the policies and such by NDJ-DE.

I did read the instructions. I would like my account unblocked please. YaoiLover2360 (talk) 01:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Star Mississippi 19:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]