User talk:Yankeecook

Welcome to Wikipedia from SQGibbon

Hi, Yankeecook. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "adopted" by an experienced user, who can show you how Wikipedia works through a program called "Adopt-a-User". Again, welcome! SQGibbon (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curry

Hello! Thanks for the effort you're putting into the Curry article. There is a problem, without providing for sources for your claims it looks like a lot of original research. I'm guessing someone is going to undo your edits at some point. If you have references to back up your claims it would be a good idea and helpful to the article if you would add them in. If you have any questions or comments you can reach me on my talk page. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tackling your questions by point

Opening Summary: You are correct, as long as the information is in the main body of the article, properly referenced, then it doesn't need a citation in the lead. If another editor comes along and deletes that information saying it's unsourced or adds a "citation needed" tag you can revert that edit as long as you state in the edit summary why you've done so. There's no need to say "see below" or use any other indication like that, it should be assumed by the reader that the main body expands on the statements in the lead.
The article itself: I have no particular interest in the article itself so I have no ideas on how to move forward on it overall. But to answer you question about discussing it with others, that's what the talk page for the article is for. It might get a little frustrating if people don't respond to your questions and comments but after a while (days?) this just means that you should go ahead and be bold and make the changes you think are needed and in your edit summary add something like "see Talk page" to the end of your normal edit summary. As for the sections that look like personal knowledge and/or contain no or few references, for the time being you can tag them with {{cn}} and if no one deals with it in a reasonable amount of time (at least a week, though usually we like to give it a month) then that stuff can be deleted. Bringing this stuff up in the talk page can help the process along.
Linking: See WP:OVERLINK. You are correct again, in fact we should not link common terms at all including "India" and "mustard" (unless the term is directly important to the subject then the link can be justified, "India" is not necessary to link to while "mustard", if it's a common ingredient in curry, could be linked to). Also useful to note is that we only need to link to something the first time it occurs in the article. So if a link is made to "mustard" in the lead paragraph then it does not need to be linked anywhere else in the article. SQGibbon (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Boston Cooking School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Igor Stravinsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED, 21 May 2013. Yankeecook (talk) 13:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Igor Stravinsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED 24 May 2013. Yankeecook (talk) 20:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Igor Stravinsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Igor Stravinsky, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Clarens and The Wedding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED, 22 May 2013 Yankeecook (talk) 13:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Igor Stravinsky, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Continuo and Concertino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED, 29 May 2013 Yankeecook (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Rite

Hi. I have opened a new thread on the Rite talkpage so that we can continue the discussion about "movements" and other content issues away from the farrago about infoboxes, on which issue I have nothing further to say. You will see that I am somewhat persuaded by your arguments on the movements terminology, though I'd like a bit more discussion. Brianboulton (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can reach me on my talkpage at any time. The infobox issue is a regular warhorse; some editors have an agenda to impose infoboxes on all WP articles, and are deaf to the argument that, while these boxes have utility within certain articles, they are inappropriate for others. The matter has been gone over endlessly, hence the snippy nature of the discourse. WP policy is quite clear: whether to add an infobox to an article is a matter of consensus among the involved editors. It is clear where the consensus lies here. Time to move on ... though the issue will undoubtedly be raised again. Brianboulton (talk) 21:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ballets Russes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FIXED Yankeecook (talk) 22:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ballets Russes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

20 Years That Changed The World of Art] Online Exhibition, Houghton Library, Harvard University]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]