User talk:Yamenah

Image copyright problem with Image:Pepper2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pepper2002.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Spottedsaddlehorse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spottedsaddlehorse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Spotted saddle horse.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Spotted saddle horse.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Spotted saddle horse.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Spotted saddle horse.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Pleven.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Pleven.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Pleven.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Pleven.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Tiger horse.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Tiger horse.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Tiger horse.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Tiger horse.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Balikun (horse)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Balikun (horse), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Balikun (horse) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Balikun (horse), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Userboxes are not easy to explain, but Wikipedia:Userboxes is the place to start.

After about three hours trying to figure them out, I now have forgotten how I did it, and when I see a cool one now, I just use copy and paste in the edit box (being VERY careful not to mess with someone else's user page!) to swipe the formatting code from other people's pages. Montanabw 04:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Blackanigallop.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blackanigallop.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding more info to the page. Could you put a notice on your web site saying that this image is public domain? That would clear up the issue. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 20:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for a project?

If you want to do another horse breed article, I ran across one that was new to me, the Carolina Marsh Tacky. Interesting rare breed. http://www.thehorse.com/viewarticle.aspx?ID=9641

There's also a web site for the rare breed survival trust that may be a good source for some interesting articles, once we make sure that there aren't already articles out there... Montanabw 18:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you want to stay out of image copyright problems, safest to use the GDFL license or else public domain. The wikigods are incredibly anal about this. Montanabw 18:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breed articles

Hey Horsecanter and Yemenah, I am not really trying to make your lives miserable by various tags, I just am trying to encourage the creation of breed articles that are REAL articles. There are a lot of new "breeds" out there that are mostly someone's marketing ploy, and a lot of "breeds" that are types, not breeds (like Sport Horse). Anyway the point is that an article needs at least one good full citation and should follow at least a sketch of an outline as found in the Horse Breeds Wikiproject. Stubs are OK, sometimes with rare breeds, we can't find much, but try to say SOMETHING unique about the breed, like where it comes from, what its unique characteristics are, etc...don't just create a sentence to remove a red link. Something like a breed is a "medium-sized riding horse" is not an article. Tell us why we should care, at least a little. Thanks. Montanabw 21:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(So what determines whether a breed is a true breed or just a crossbreed? Practically every breed except the Arabian is a crossbreed, and where is the line drawn? I read that the Aegidienberger may not actually be a true breed but a crossbreed, but where is the line drawn? --Yamenah 14:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC))

Basically, if we can't find anything more than horse breed X is crossed on horse breed Y and the registry for the "breed" formed within the last 10 years at web site www.makememoney.com (grin), please send your application with $100 and two cereal box tops, we should at least say so in the article and list the question of whether this is a "crossbred" or a "breed" as a controversy. (Sort of like the "is it a horse or a pony? Question. Just state the official position and then discuss the controversy and other views on the matter). I personally like the definition of breed used in the wikipedia article, in that a breed is a population that passes on characteristics to its get, i.e. breeds "true," but that is also pretty nebulous and hard to define. I guess my take on the matter is that we are doing OK if we use authoritative sources like Oklahoma State and the International Museum of the Horse. If they want to call it a breed, and have articles with useful information that we can utilize, then at least we have verifiability from a neutral source and not just commercial linkspam. For example, Palomino is NOT and cannot be more than a color breed because it is genetically impossible for Palominos to always throw Palominos. OTOH, Friesians can be a breed and be of only one color as a genetic characteristic, it isn't genetically impossible. Anyway, my take is that if IMH and OSU both say it's a breed, we are passing Wikipedia's verifiability guidelines, which is what really matters here. Beyond that, don't cut and paste (copyright violation) but do say more than a sentence. Otherwise, leave the red link for someone else who has time to do the job. You're not the worst offender here, FYI... Montanabw 17:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zhemaichu

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zhemaichu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zhemaichu fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Article "Žemaitukas" is about this pony breed

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zhemaichu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Zhemaichu itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

back drawing

Hey, the skeleton superimposed over the horse photo was a very cool idea, but when I enlarged it, I noticed some errors, namely that you left out the sacrum, the vertebrae that make up the croup, instead you went right from the lumbar to the coccygeal vertebrae, puting about half the sacrum in one set and half in the other... The lumbar stop at the pelvis, and the Coccyx starts at the dock of the tail. May want to fix that before someone deletes the image. Montanabw 06:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skeletons

Here's one, labeled diagram is toward the bottom of the page, though it doesn't mark the beginning and end of each section: http://www.cyberhorse.net.au/cgi-bin/tve/displaynewsitem.pl?20040208skeletalbasics.txt

Here's one of people and dogs: http://137.222.110.150/calnet/musculo/page8.htm Note the proportions on the dog are way different...far shorter lumbar region, longer tail. But translating to a hrose, figure the Lumbar are the 5-6 verebrae after the last rib (each thoracic vertebrae has a rib hanging off of it), and stop at the ilium, where the sacrum begins. The sacrum is fused, so the coggygeal vertebrae start where you see the fairly obvious flexible joint and fairly dramatic change in size of the vertebrae.

You could also ask User:Eventer is she can scan something. She's the anatomy guru. Montanabw 16:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks even cooler, I like the addition of muscles and such (!) but the coccygeal vertebrae look a wee bit too far forward because the line hits at the last sacral vertebrae, I'd tweak that a wee bit, seeing as how you got to it so fast (grin). Also, the Thoracic vertebrae begin at the end of the cervical vertebrae, so maybe nudge that starting line up a bit, I know it will look a little weird with the scapula in the way, don't know the solution there, but kick it around and see what works. You do have a knack for this...Montanabw 16:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Say! We noticed (finally) that the entire image Image:Horseanatomy.png has multiple mislabelings, not just the spinal column (says the horse has a collarbone, and it doesn't.) Any way you can "deconstruct" that image to take off ALL the labels and then re-upload it so myself or User:Eventer can relabel it properly? Let me know, and thanks in advance. (FYI, check out horse anatomy and the related new articles, Eventer has been busy!) Montanabw^(talk) 03:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Will tell Eventer. Montanabw^(talk) 19:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have actually now fixed the diagram myself. Unfortunately with a diagram this size (the master file is layered and 7000 x 6000 pixels and is 250mb in size) just opening it is no small affair so it takes me a fair amount of time to do it. I would not recommend clipping out the old labels as you'd be editing the rasterised small version thats uploaded here to wikipedia. Generally in graphic design theres a rule of thumb that everything is drawn 3 times the final size and then resized down to give it detail and sharpness. If you notice any more problems with the diagram or have a label you'd like me to add if you let me know I should be able to make changes to it much quicker now that I have the image master file to hand and up to date with the version here. Thanks WikipedianProlific ^(Talk) 10:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the relabeled image. It's much better, and the additional, fairly minor glitches are discussed on the creator's talk page. Still, while I'm glad it's fixed, I'm glad Yemenah was willing to start the "fixing" process. I would have been doing labels in Word or something, so the "fixed" image would not have been of as high resolution, but accuracy does count! Montanabw^(talk) 20:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Spotted Paso

A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article American Spotted Paso, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Montanabw^(talk) 21:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ilfeld01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ilfeld01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Spotted saddle horse.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Spotted saddle horse.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, horse breeds

Hi. I have been revising some horse-related templates, and I noticed that the horse breed articles could do with better categorizing; see Template talk:Equine#Continuing. If you would like to help, please jump in. I think you have a better idea than I would re how to group them. I prefer categories to a list, by the way, because a breed can be listed in any and all relevant categories: eg, both a pony breeds category and a horse breeds category. --Una Smith (talk) 23:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Delilah_3.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Delilah_3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barebackriding1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Barebackriding1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Nagle (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi Yamenah!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Yamenah! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Yamenah! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Blackanigallop.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Tiger horse

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tiger horse, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20050206131319/http://tigerhorses.org/history.html and probably other pages of the same website, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tiger horse and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Tiger horse, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tiger horse with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tiger horse. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tiger horse saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:EquineToplines.gif

The file File:EquineToplines.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Raptorcursor.gif

The file File:Raptorcursor.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sunset on the Med Zichron Yaaqov.JPG

The file File:Sunset on the Med Zichron Yaaqov.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PrairieView01.jpg

The file File:PrairieView01.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]