User talk:YahushaReigns

Welcome!

Hello, YahushaReigns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MaenK.A._Talk 08:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I undid an edit of yours

at Los Lunas Decalogue Stone and then undid my undoing because I saw what you were doing. I do think that you need to reference or source all the material that you have posted there or there is a pretty good chance that it will get removed. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want reference for Hypothetical Graphic representation of Era with probable cause for rendering the inscription or resources for the interpretation of Modern Hebrew Translation given of the inscription?YahushaReigns (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)YahushaReigns[reply]

June 2010

Once again, I apologize. I thought that copyrighted material had to be ditto with a pointed ref.

The "V" vav ancestry of "W" waw in "YHWH" was not intended to be represented as the "yod" for the ancestry. Wikipeda is inconsistent with their representation of the [waw] ancestry of Roman W back to the Aramaic U [waw] and then the Paleo Y [waw]. YahushaReigns (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)YahushaReigns[reply]

Your addition to W has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thanks for your desire to help add information, but Wikipedia cannot use directly copy-pasted information even if it is properly cited. But you can put the important information into your own words and then cite the Oxford references as your sources; that would be generally acceptable. Thank you. Princess Lirin (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to V has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please DO NOT copy-paste content into Wikipedia articles, no matter how good your source is. If you want to add text in your own words, that's great. But EVEN IF YOU CITE WHERE YOU'RE COPY-PASTING FROM, you still MUST NOT add material that was not written by you. Thank you. Princess Lirin (talk) 04:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to V, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you continue to insist upon violating Oxford Reference's copyright, I will have to bring this to the attention of an administrator. Princess Lirin (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Tetragrammaton

First off, modern computer-generated fancy decorative ornate renderings of the Tetragrammaton which do not add anything of substance to the basic image File:Tetragrammaton_scripts.svg really have no place on the article. Second, a lot of the textual material you added to the article was either very dubious or very irrelevant. (For example that the Greek letter Upsilon changed in sound-value from a [u] vowel to an umlaut or front-rounded [ǖ] vowel is really quite irrelevant to the Tetragrammaton, since the "Y" in "YHWH" was never intended to represent either a [u] vowel or [ǖ] vowel, but only a [y] consonant, as in "yes", "yawn", "yellow" etc.) And third, "Yahusha"[sic] never existed in Hebrew, so is completely bogus as a supposed historical divine name... AnonMoos (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I thought if one used the articles from a copyrighted source it had to be ditto with a point back to the ref. YahushaReigns (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)YahushaReigns[reply]

Blocked

Yahusha יהושע "The Scriptures" p. xii Dr. Solomon Zeitlin (see The Jewish Quarterly Review, Jan. 1970, p. 195). Also see Post-exilic Apostasy in the Explanatory Notes at the back.

I never changed the Hebrew spelling of the Ha Shem Messiah only the English Interpretation/Pronunciation.

First off, modern computer-generated ornate renderings of the Paleo-Hebrew YHUH/YHWH and Modern Hebrew Tetragrammaton were added in the article, anyway. Mine were of historical resources .

The "V" vav ancestry of "W" waw in "YHWH" was not intended to be represented as the "yod" for the ancestry. Wikipeda is inconsistent with their representation of the [waw] ancestry of Roman W back to the Aramaic U [waw] and then the Paleo Y [waw].

The transliteration of the en vowel [U] whether a [u] vowel or [ǖ] vowel, instead of [vv]or [w] consonant and the better pronunciation. (For example ability for pronunciation of the Greek letter Upsilon changed in sound-value from a [u] vowel to an umlaut or front-rounded [ǖ] vowel was relevant to the Tetragrammaton as far as the representation by many that there are no vowels in the tetragrammaton.

And third, "Yahusha" [as in the same tetragrammaton of Yashua ref. Strong's Concordance "sha" for Deliverer instead of "shua" for "scream" or "cry"] therefore the English pronunciation does exists from the Hebrew Word, so is NOT completely bogus as a supposed historical divine name.

Yahusha יהושע "The Scriptures" p. xii Dr. Solomon Zeitlin (see The Jewish Quarterly Review, Jan. 1970, p. 195). Also see Post-exilic Apostasy in the Explanatory Notes at the back.

YahushaReigns (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)YahushaReigns[reply]

AnonMoos (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Creating copyright violations. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YahushaReigns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Please, forgive! Yahusha יהושע "The Scriptures" p. xii Dr. Solomon Zeitlin (see The Jewish Quarterly Review, Jan. 1970, p. 195). Also see Post-exilic Apostasy in the Explanatory Notes at the back. I copyrighted because of a learned blockquote applications taught in web design. Upon further reading your rules; I shall apply them with all due haste. Thank you for your patience; I'm just a beginner

Decline reason:

Since several days have passed without your participating in any more discussion, I'm assuming you've changed your mind about this unblock request, and declining it. If you were just out of town, and do want to be unblocked and to discuss how you'll edit differently in the future, feel free to ask again. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you now fully understand wikipedia copyright policy, which stipulates, in part, that you cannot add any text here which has been printed elsewhere, unless it is expressly stated that the text is in public domain, or you own the copyright, or the owner of the copyright has given permission, in correct wikipedia format, for his text to be used here?--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On reading my message, I will concede that you can include a quotation, suitably highlighted, within an article composed using your own words. But you have not been doing that. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YahushaReigns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

change username

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock to change username Yahusha. Shall apply the correct use for source material in the future. YahushaReigns (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YahushaReigns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

bogus assumed edit

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for the withdrawal YahushaReigns (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Infringement

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YahushaReigns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Perhaps the literature could accepted like the Creative Commons License? If Wikipedia wants to accept improvised, not copied verbatim, then I apologise if the literature can't be accepted by Wikipedia. "Copyright Institute for Scripture Research - The Scriptures 1998

Portions from The Scriptures may be quoted freely in any format, provided that: The text of The Scriptures may be quoted at any one time up to and inclusive of one hundred (100) verses without express written permission from the Institute for Scripture Research, providing the verses do not amount to a complete book of The Scriptures nor do the verses quoted account for more than 10% of the total work in which they are quoted.

Notice of copyright must appear on the title or copyright page of the work as follows: "Scripture taken from The Scriptures, Copyright by Institute for Scripture Research. Used by permission".

When quotations from The Scriptures are used in media, such as bulletins, orders of service, posters, transparencies or similar media, the abbreviation The Scriptures (ISR) may be used at the end of the quotation.

The following conditions apply when quoting from The Scriptures: No change whatsoever is made to the text. The quotation from The Scriptures is quoted in context." ~ www.google.com/amp/s/www.bible.com/-amp/versions/316.html YahushaReigns (talk) 00:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not appear to be an unblock request. But to answer your question, no, Wikipedia can not accept copyrighted text that is under such restriction. It must be released at least as freely as CC BY-SA which allows unrestricted onwards use for any purpose, including commercial and including with modification. If you want to be unblocked, please re-read the previous discussions and make a new request in which you make it clear that you understand Wikipedia's copyright policy and will adhere to it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YahushaReigns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

withdraw as an American editor because of Wikipedia racism to decline an appropriate use of an American copyright in America

Decline reason:

Removing talk page access for continued frivolous unblock requests RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.