User talk:Yadevol

Density

I put the formal definition section of the density page back in. The scales on the axes are what make it dimensionally correct. It looks weird, but I derived it both with the chain rule and also by writing an elemental volume and I tested it against a few different mass functions, it seems to work. I've fixed it up a bit so that it's easier to read, and I took out the time dependent bit because I admit it makes it more confusing, and I really can't explain what dV/dt is (comes from the chain rule, but if I can't make sense of it I shouldn't have put it in). I think it's necessary to have this information because I kind of needed that relation for project, couldn't find it, derived it myself, and whenever I do that I edit wikipedia. The problem is that the usual m/V doesn't say anything about nonhomogeneous matter, so the more generic definition (dm/dV) is important.

I'll check this talk page in case there's any trouble...

(day later, sorry didn't sign) You know what? It's not working. The mass functions I used to test it were flawed and happened to give the right density. I've removed it myself until fixed. Sorry for being a smartass. -Ben pcc 16:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James Badro

I have nominated James Badro, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Badro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — TheBilly^(Talk) 19:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of James Badro

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as James Badro, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ecole d'Essayage des Canapes

I have nominated Ecole d'Essayage des Canapes, an article you created, for deletion. In my opinion this article fails to satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for reasons given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecole d'Essayage des Canapes. Your opinions on this are welcome there, and you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns.
— Objectivesea (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Physics participation

You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 15:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Icexii.jpg

File:Icexii.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Icexii-ru.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Icexii-ru.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Icexii.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Icexii.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ---- Luk ^talk 07:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cboy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cboy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PleaseStand (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cboy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cboy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!