User talk:YGgisoft77

September 2024

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, William Saliba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to William Saliba. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Saliba, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: William Saliba was changed by YGgisoft77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905846 on 2024-09-07T09:23:43+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kai Havertz. Cassiopeia talk 09:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for disruptive editing

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Mitch32^{(it's you I like.)} 14:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YGgisoft77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did not vandalise, merely stated factual information and provided sources to back it up, requesting to be unblocked. thanks. YGgisoft77 (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What utter nonsense. You repeatedly edited the articles of Arsenal players to assert that they were regarded as the best. For three you used sources (I haven't checked the sources) but for two you cited no source and edit-warred to maintain your assertion in Wikipedia's voice. Cabayi (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.