User talk:YDHbulldog

Why do you keep vandalizing the YDH page? Please stop.

February 2013

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Yeshiva Derech HaTorah, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YDHbulldog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

all that I am doing is removing false and malicious material YDHbulldog (talk) 20:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining this request because I find your response lacking in detail and scope. Tiderolls 20:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit-warring over material is still not good. That said, if you got blocked for "vandalism" over this, then The Brooklyn Rabbi (talk · contribs), the person you were edit-warring with, should also be blocked for it. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

• I've contacted the blocking admin. I'd like their input before acting on your request, YDHbulldog. Tiderolls 03:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I said "vandalism" because of the removal of the literary magazine stuff, which they've been doing since the beginning. Maybe they were on a crusade and just did a really poor job of it, that's possible. Jeske, their opponent was on the verge of an indef block for POV editing. If YDH Bulldog can spend a few words on the matter of the literary journal and it convinces you, Tide, then an unblock is fine with me, on the condition that the bulldog stops shooting from the hip and starts using edit summaries. BTW, the contentious material is out and will stay out, if I can help it. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks, professor. I'll await YDHbulldog's response. Tiderolls 03:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Additionally

YDHbulldog, your reponse should've been posted by using the "Edit" tab or the "New section" tab at the top of this page; you posted the response as a category which adds difficulty in completing a review. Complying with talk page guidelines would not have resulted in a different decision on my part as the response would've been insufficient regardless of format. I only mention this so that you may properly format any future messages you post. Any steps you can take to make a reviewers' job easier helps you in the long run. Tiderolls 20:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)