User talk:Xymmax/Archives/2007/December

Louise Stanley

Regarding the deletion-cut-and-paste of comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Stanley: That's okay, as long as our comments are still there in some way. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Unintentional on my - part no idea how that happened. Thanks for the correction :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 16:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Peter Yarrow Discussion page

Would you please re-enter this discussion. Your input would be helpful. David in DC (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

oops

I think you (or your bot) reverted an edit of mine unfairly, on the Social Security article. ~

no problem -- yeah, when i have more time, i'll revert it and then expand as to how it fits the definition of pyramid/ponzi scheme to a T —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.154.204 (talk) 03:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

RE: Kansai Time Out

Thanks for the heads up, it looks like several editors don't feel that Time Out meets speedy criteria (let alone general deletion criteria), so I'm defiantely not going to readd the CSD template and instead let the AfD run its course. I don't feel there is enough context to the article nor that the 30 years of publication is nessacarially a valid assertion of notability (unless some independent sources can prove otherwise), but its not about my oppinion, its about consensus. Mr Senseless (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:Reversion

I feel picked on. Just kidding, just kidding! Good job catching all that vandalism though. Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 21:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Why thank you! And don't worry, you didn't butcher anything, because you did correct it after all. Anyway, happy vandal hunting! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 00:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)