User talk:Xxxxxxxxxxx
Welcome!
Hello, Xxxxxxxxxxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Username
[edit]Please consider choosing a more suitable username. Thank you. SCHZMO ✍ 18:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- And what's wrong with my username?
- According to Wikipedia:Username, my username is completely appropriate.
- Xxxxxxxxxxx 00:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry if I seemed rude to you. I see you have made many useful contributions. I guess it was because your username seemed nonsensical (no offense) and it's hard to remember (the number of x's). Also, I assumed that since User:Aaaaaaaaaaa was blocked indefinitely then your username might be inappropriate too... SCHZMO ✍ 01:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
ASRS notes
[edit]Why would anyone able to read Wikipedia be unable to read the ASRS report? It's a Web page.
Of all the data points you added in the second edit, the only one that strikes me as remotely relevant is the weather conditions, and the only way that would be relevant is if the reason the pilots were confused was because of poor visibility, which they make no mention of in the report. I think it's sufficient that we state a similar incident happened once before. (We don't go into excessive detail on the other similar incidents/accidents either, by the way.)--chris.lawson 03:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Curtiss class seaplane tenders
[edit]Hello Xxxxxxxxxxx, I noticed you created Category:Curtiss class seaplane tenders and wondered how you'd feel about a proposal to change the name to something like [[:Category:Seaplane tenders of the United States Navy]] with the Curtiss class as a sub-category? Thanks for your time, Anynobody 06:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Category:Tier 1b
[edit]Category:Tier 1b, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 23:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Scaled Composites Tier 1b for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scaled Composites Tier 1b is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scaled Composites Tier 1b until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Three-stage-to-orbit for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three-stage-to-orbit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three-stage-to-orbit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)