User talk:XxPixel WarriorxX

Welcome!

Hello, XxPixel WarriorxX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Priyanka Purohit did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kleuske (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In reality I was going to add it I had the link but wikipedia started to malfunction and wasn't showing me the personal life column so that I can add references XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Wikipedia malfunctioned? Well, when at first you don’t succeed... Kleuske (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was not my first time bro. It's my second ID I didn't liked my name at 1st ID so I changed XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Priyanka Purohit, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 08:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sending the link XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 09:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Dolly (sheep). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 15:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You Idiot I was going to add reference but you deleted it!! Darn you I will need to do it again XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 15:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry Killarnee please forgive me for what I said please XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I understand for what I have to do Kleukse XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's simple:

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. with no edit, using any account or anonymously, on English Wikipedia. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a . I know you think Yamla that I am fake but there is a angry nature of everybody you all say I abused multiple accounts but it was only one and I even apologized to Killarnee and I repeat nobody else exists in wikipedia that I would have abused. You know just want to tell you how I started it was just one day I scrolling through the new Zealand cricket team captain's wikipedia when I saw a very big error it was his birth place changed entirely to India so I changed and made it normal but after a week I realized that we can edit Wikipedia so I wanted to contribute so I opened but to my dispair I found I was blocked by JBW saying I did vandalism for a long time. At first I did not understand how is that possible so I searched because I had edited only one time then I found I edited without loging in and somebody with a similar IP address git blocked and along with him I also got blocked for like six months I waited cause I did not know what to do. It was a tough stay I have to say but I stayed once it opened on 15th Aprril I instantly started editing without thinking and it caused me to get scolded and threatened to be blocked then I got to know we have to add references then It took me a week or two to understand that how to add reference then I started adding pictures that I did not know about Copyrights and again got threatened about being blocked then came killarnee he deleted my edit in less than a minute because of being unsourced I got angry(but I later apologized) because I just came back with the link to add I did it all again but it got removed and guess why again me nit knowing rules that we have to write it on our own and simply not to copy. Then I did a small edit of Miss-spelling but again Kleuske said I have to add source for a spelling error I added and he thanked me. I was happy for a short period of time. I found I got banned by Ivanvector for sock puppetry I again not knowing rules got blocked. FWIW I tried to explain that I felt like I copied someone that I am not which is Dude Perfect. I put my name Tylertoney Dude Perfect which was 100% copied so I net searched how to delete account but it said I cannot delete it. But I can start afresh so I thought Let's start a new account but in a span of four days I got banned why as always not knowing rules I did not know that I will have to mention it in my first account that I have a second account so I tried reaching people telling them to please understand and give me a second chance but you said I was fake to some extent it was true but not fully I tried to become a good editor so I started being friendly and two days later I got banned. So please understand I want to edit. So please help me and understand. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.I promise I won't do it again. Please. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XxPixel WarriorxX, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi XxPixel WarriorxX! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Sure I will be there!! XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ajay Chaudhary. Kleuske (talk) 06:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Kleuske I am sorry and I would not repeat it again XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

| image=

File:A message to all that think I did it Purposely.jpg

| caption= A message by me XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Astrid Kirchherr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jusdafax: I'm not sure it was vandalism. It may have been a mistake, caused by reading "he" as referring to Astrid Kirchherr, rather than Stuart Sutcliffe. I have rephrased the sentence to make sure it can't be misreading it that way in the future. JBW (talk) 23:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jusdafax:Sorry, I misohrased it and thought it was about herinstead of him. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misphrased XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Will you please cite sourcing when editing? This has become a recurrent issue. Continuing to add unsourced material is disruptive. Please see WP:CITE for instructions. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have understood my mistake and plead a sorry please unblock me XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30465

UTRS #30465 was submitted on 2020-05-07 15:44:11. This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean 😨. It does not look good XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help 🙏 XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's simple:

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. with no edit, using any account or anonymously, on English Wikipedia. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a . I know you think Yamla that I am fake but there is a angry nature of everybody you all say I abused multiple accounts but it was only one and I even apologized to Killarnee and I repeat nobody else exists in wikipedia that I would have abused. You know just want to tell you how I started it was just one day I scrolling through the new Zealand cricket team captain's wikipedia when I saw a very big error it was his birth place changed entirely to India so I changed and made it normal but after a week I realized that we can edit Wikipedia so I wanted to contribute so I opened but to my dispair I found I was blocked by JBW saying I did vandalism for a long time. At first I did not understand how is that possible so I searched because I had edited only one time then I found I edited without loging in and somebody with a similar IP address git blocked and along with him I also got blocked for like six months I waited cause I did not know what to do. It was a tough stay I have to say but I stayed once it opened on 15th Aprril I instantly started editing without thinking and it caused me to get scolded and threatened to be blocked then I got to know we have to add references then It took me a week or two to understand that how to add reference then I started adding pictures that I did not know about Copyrights and again got threatened about being blocked then came killarnee he deleted my edit in less than a minute because of being unsourced I got angry(but I later apologized) because I just came back with the link to add I did it all again but it got removed and guess why again me nit knowing rules that we have to write it on our own and simply not to copy. Then I did a small edit of Miss-spelling but again Kleuske said I have to add source for a spelling error I added and he thanked me. I was happy for a short period of time. I found I got banned by Ivanvector for sock puppetry I again not knowing rules got blocked. FWIW I tried to explain that I felt like I copied someone that I am not which is Dude Perfect. I put my name Tylertoney Dude Perfect which was 100% copied so I net searched how to delete account but it said I cannot delete it. But I can start afresh so I thought Let's start a new account but in a span of four days I got banned why as always not knowing rules I did not know that I will have to mention it in my first account that I have a second account so I tried reaching people telling them to please understand and give me a second chance but you said I was fake to some extent it was true but not fully I tried to become a good editor so I started being friendly and two days later I got banned. So please understand I want to edit. So please help me and understand. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.I promise I won't do it again. Please. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 05:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxPixel WarriorxX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know what I did and I did not do it in a mindset to cause trouble or to hurt the wikipedia it was because I wanted to have a new start afresh and that is allowed as Wikipedia's rules and policies and because I did not know that we also have to mention in our first account that we have a second account if I would have known that then I would not have been blocked. About being abusive I did was rude to Killarnee but I am sorry and Plead mercy so please Unblock me. Thanks for 😇 XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to request unblock from your original account. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Need Help

How to add a infobox of a person I an not able too mkae it please help@JBW: XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's an amazing number of different infoboxes for particular types of people, which if you are interested you can see listed at Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes#Person. For example, there's an infobox for architects, one for poker players, and so on. I am not the best person to ask if you want to know details of all those different kinds of infoboxes and how to use them, because I have scarcely ever added infoboxes to articles. (In fact I'm not sure whether I ever have.) However, here are some basic instructions which should be enough for you to get started.

Copy this to the top of the article:

{{Infobox person

| name =

| image =

| caption =

| birth_name =

| birth_date =

| birth_place =

| death_date =

| death_place =

| nationality =

| occupation =

| years_active =

| known_for =

}}

After the equal signs you can fill in relevant information. For example, after "name = " fill in the person's name. If there is a picture of the person uploaded to Wikipedia you can add it after "image = ", and after "caption =" add text to show next to the image, explaining what it's a picture of. You don't have to fill in every line: for example, obviously if the person is still alive you will leave "death_date" and "death_place" blank, or you can remove those lines altogether. Don't put anything for "birth_name" unless the name the person's is normally known by is different from the one they started life with. So an example might look something like this:

{{Infobox person

| name = Joe Jones

| image = JoeJonesInCairo.jpg

| caption = Joe Jones visiting Cairo in 2015

| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1990|05|28}}

| birth_place = Sydney

| death_date =

| death_place =

| nationality = Australian

| occupation = Singer

| years_active = 2010 - present

}}

(Dates should be in the form Year|month|day.)

More information is at Template:Infobox person, but I suggest you just stick to something fairly simple, such as the example I have given, until you have more experience, to avoid getting confused and making mistakes. JBW (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:19, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"This user has been on Wikipedia for 13 years, 9 months and 15 days." How did you add that I also want to add. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 05:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are Centijimbos. Please answer these two questions @JBW: XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I spent some time finding out how to get the user box saying how long you've been on Wikipedia, because I didn't remember, and writing out an explanation for you. Before I saved the edit, however, I found you had already found out how to do it and done it. It would have been better to either remove the question about it, or add a note saying that you now know how to do it, so that I wouldn't waste time on it.
Centijimbos are a sort of jokey way of measuring the number of people who have a page on their watch list. A centijimbo is one hundredth of the number of people watching Jimbo Wales's user page and talk page. Right now there are 3,794 people watching his user page, so a centijimbo is 37.94 people. The number of people watching my user page is 740, so my number of centijimbos is 740 ÷ 37.94 = 19.5045. JBW (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Sorry I forgot to mention it to you. So thank you for answering and helping. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 00:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Can you please tell me how to become a member of Women in red. I really want to become a member of it. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What all things I need to do if I want to become an Admin Please tell me @JBW: XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Please Help 1.) Tell me how to become a member of Women in Red and 2.) How to become a AutoPatroller please I will do anything just please tell me how XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:How to become an Pending Changes Reviewer? XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 03:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't answered any of these questions before, but I'll do my best to answer now.

Pending changes reviewer: First make sure you know exactly what is involved, by reading Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes if you haven't already, and if you then still think it is suitable for you then apply at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer. I am not one of the administrators who deal with requests there, so I don't know much about what standards are maintained, but my guess is that more exeprience is needed than you have right now.
AutoPatroller: Do you mean how to become autopatrolled? If so, that is useful only for editors who create large numbers of articles, which is not yet so for you.
Administrator: First you need to get far more experience than you have so far. That experience needs to include a range of areas related to admin work, both to show that you understand what is involved and can be relied on to deal with the issues appropriately and because if you don't do work in those areas then you will have no use for the admin tools, so there's no point in having them. Admin related work includes such things as deletion discussions, anti-vandalism work, sockpuppet investigations, cases on the administrators' noticeboards, and so on. It is not necessary to have experience in every area of admin work (I have been an administrator for 10 years, and there are some areas that I have never touched) but you do need to have experience in some of them. You also need to show that you can deal with other editors in a constructive way. When you are ready, either you or (much better) another experienced editor can nominate you for adminship. Then there is a discussion in which editors are free to indicate their opinions as to whether you are suitable to be an administrator. details are at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, but you shouldn't even consider going in for it until you have been actively editing for at least another 6 months or so, and probably much longer than that. I have just checked the editing history of the last few editors to become administrators. All of them have been editors for at least a year and a half, some of them for many years, and all of them have at least 14,000 edits, some of them hundreds of thousands. If you want to see what kind of things are taken into consideration when requests for adminship are considered, here are the discussions for the most recent 7 requests for adminship:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Guy Macon

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lee Vilenski

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Prahlad balaji

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Creffett

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CaptainEek

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jo-Jo Eumerus

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cwmhiraeth 2.

The good news is that you are perfectly able to join "Women in Red" if you would like to. Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red tells you about the project, and to join go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Members, where you will find a link labelled "Join WikiProject". JBW (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Thanks for the answers I know you would reply. I know you think it is how stupid of me to ask such questions when I am not even an Extended Confirmed User, it is just I wanted to know and start working on that way that's it. And Also I want to mention that I saw and edit in Gilgit-Baltistan that I find inappropriate but can't remove because it is Extended protected page. Gilgit-Baltistan is a disputed region between India and Pakistan. In it there is a fact mentioned that says that the population of Gilgit-Baltistan wants to accend to Pakistan with some references I don't think it is Neutral to write such a fact in a very disputed region so please remove it if you think it is appropriate to remove. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 09:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I don't think it's at all stupid of you to ask. We all start out not knowing stuuf like that, and asking people who do know is a perfectly reasonable way of learning.

I usually avoid anything to do with India-Pakistan disputes, because it's sich a fraught area, and trying to do anything useful is so frustrating and time-wasting. However, I'll have a look, and see what I think. JBW (talk) 13:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Well do you even know how I know you?

XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 15:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:Hey is a barnstar a type of AWARD given on wikipedia and if yes then How can I win it. 🤔

XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freddy Daruwala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Akshay Kumar. - Arjayay (talk) 18:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tera Kya Hoga Alia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tera Kya Hoga Alia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Celsetina007:Ok I will do

Pixel Lupus (talk) 11:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit revert in the page Andhra Pradesh

Hi,

Recently found your reverted edit on the article Andhra Pradesh. Please go through the source. It says the capital is "Amaravathi" only. There is nothing mentioned like the capital is "Hyderabad" which is made up to 2024. Once it was Hyderabad but after the splitting and formation of Telengana Amaravathi became the capital city. Please go through the source and make correction if it seems reliable. Outlander07 15:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok will see to it. Anyway I meant a different source that fully signifies that Amravati as the capital XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated with AndhraPradesh Capital details

Hi Pixel,

It does not make sense to use Hyderabad as Capital to AP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manforap (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tera Kya Hoga Alia (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability - Note IMDB is not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tera Kya Hoga Alia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tera Kya Hoga Alia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking pages

For the second time today I've encountered a page which you have blanked and then nominated for deletion. Please stop blanking pages. Cabayi (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant

The pages I blanked today were all 1 lined things, unsourced, Not on a notable person or thing, with no info about that particular thing on internet So I think I did not do anything wrong. Even one of the pages from a user was on his own that user did not even know that he needed to make it on his user page not a main Wikipedia page. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating them for deletion is fine. Blanking the page is not necessary and makes more work for the admin looking at your deletion request. Cabayi (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi:Understood Thanks Cap for telling me that I love learning things cause I want to be a specialist. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help 2

@Raintheone: Can you tell me how to become a pending changes Reviewer. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Different World (Alan Walker album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamond Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ytpks896 (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]