User talk:Xuxalliope/Archives/2012/April

Hyderabad State Map

Ok can you make the request. I think we should show it on a map of India--Monareal (talk) 06:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I noticed the Hyderabad state's also on near the bottom. Did you submit this picture with your request? Xuxalliope (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

You!!!!I did NOT make the request. I just suggested if you make the request because My request was removed.--Monareal (talk) 10:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I was referring to the entry you included on the section half of the Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop#Three_Rebellions_in_Shouchun section. It is signed by your name, so please clarify what you mean by not making the request. Xuxalliope (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

It is not the second part .That is my request and yesterday evening , it appeared like that in my watchlist that a bot had deleted it. The next time I acessed the watchlist , it was gone. --Monareal (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The Graphist has not still replied--Monareal (talk) 07:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay, in the meantime I am going to use as the map for the article. I found it on the french wikipedia's Hyderabad state article. By the way, I'm not sure what kind of map you are looking for. Are you sure this one won't do? Xuxalliope (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

This is a location map of Poland. This map has the idea of the map I want

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Monareal (talk • contribs) 12:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the map so graphists wont mistaken there is already a map. I have posted 2 more old maps so the work would be easier. But even after 10 days, I have no replies.--Monareal (talk) 12:54, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Chinese Task Force

I know I am getting back to you late but I joined the Chinese task force hoping to get some direction from people as to things to review or work on considering China is such a big subject. Obviously it failed in that regard for me... but will the merger lead to more action on the part of China related articles? It does not look like the other group has much activity either but then again a broad focus might attract more interest. I certainly would be interested to discuss it, though if the more active members thing merging will be beneficial I would gladly give my support--Shadowy Sorcerer (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2012 (UTC)